SAASINSPECTOR
LanguageTool logo

LanguageTool Review

As an AI writing assistant, LanguageTool checks grammar, spelling and style across many languages as you type. It suits multilingual writers and teams who work inside Word, Google Docs, Gmail and a beta Outlook add-in. Paid plans add a personal dictionary, while higher-tier plans layer on a shared style guide.

Visit LanguageToolFrom $25.48/mo

Research-based review. Features and prices are checked on the vendor's own website, and the score is worked out from those facts. We haven't tested it hands-on yet.

The verdict

Worth paying for teams that need a shared style guide and personal dictionary across many languages, though solo writers may only need the basic grammar checks it already catches.

Pros

  • Supports grammar, style, and spelling checking across 30+ languages including multiple dialects, making it genuinely useful for multilingual users.
  • Has been operational since 2003, predating most competitors including Grammarly, indicating long-term stability and refinement.
  • Integrates across a wide range of surfaces including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, macOS, Windows, Google Docs, Microsoft Word, LibreOffice, Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail, and Thunderbird.
  • Picky Mode offers an adjustable level of style critique, letting writers choose how aggressively the tool pushes back on their writing.
  • The AI paraphraser has five rewriting modes (general, formal, concise, fluent and simple) for sentence-level refinement.
  • Personal dictionary feature allows technical writers and specialists to add field-specific terms, reducing false positives.
  • Style Guide feature at Premium and Teams levels enables organizations to enforce custom writing rules consistently.

Cons

  • The tool is narrower in scope than competitors like Grammarly, which may disappoint users expecting a full-featured writing assistant.
  • AI functionality is limited to sentence-level paraphrasing and is not a content generation platform, which will confuse users expecting Jasper-like capabilities.
  • Advanced features like the Style Guide are locked behind Premium and Teams pricing tiers, limiting value for free users.
  • Depth of checking may not match the breadth of language support, meaning multilingual users could find suggestions inconsistent across languages.
  • Users with specialized vocabularies face friction until they manually build out their personal dictionary to avoid repeated false corrections.
From $25.48/moFree plan Yes
5.2/10

Spec Score

LanguageTool against 6 AI writing assistants
#4
of 6 AI writing assistants
-0.5
vs the average
100%
from published facts
Ahead of other AI writing assistants
Teams and control+3.3
Behind other AI writing assistants
What it helps with-2.3Pricing-1.8
Every criterion
Tap a row for the facts
What it helps with3.5
-2.3 vs 5.8 avg10.5 of 30 points
Fixes spelling and grammaryes2 / 2
Checks for plagiarismno0 / 2
Writes new text from a promptno0 / 1.5
Writes in a saved voice or styleyes1.5 / 1.5
Builds citationsno0 / 1
Detects AI-written textno0 / 1
Rewrites AI text to read as humanno0 / 1
Why these numbers

Checks for plagiarism: No plagiarism-checker page/feature found in the sitemap or on premium/business pages.

Writes new text from a prompt: Checked homepage and full sitemap.xml for a 'generate'/AI-writer page, none found. Product only checks grammar/style and paraphrases existing text.

Writes in a saved voice or style: Delivered via the Team Style Guide feature (custom rules to define a tone and writing style for all team members).

Builds citations: No citation feature/page found in the sitemap or on premium/business pages.

Detects AI-written text: No AI-detector page/feature found in the sitemap or on premium/business pages.

Rewrites AI text to read as human: No humanizer page/feature found in the sitemap or on premium/business pages.

Pricing4.0
-1.8 vs 5.8 avg10 of 25 points
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan$25.48/mo4 / 10
Why these numbers

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: Plan: Premium (monthly). Read: Chrome screenshot; the page prices in CAD for this browser (a ?currency=USD parameter did not change it). Payment interval picker: Monthly CA$34.90, Quarterly CA$18.30/mo, Annual CA$7.49/mo (CA$89.90/yr), 2 years CA$6.25/mo. Monthly taken. All prices incl. VAT..

Where it works7.5
+0.3 vs 7.2 avg15 of 20 points
Works as you type in other appsyes2 / 2
Browsers it has an extension forchromeedgefirefox2.5 / 3
Word, Google Docs, Outlook, Gmail and Slack add-inswordgoogle_docsoutlookgmail3 / 3
Phone keyboard that checks as you typeno0 / 2
Why these numbers

Browsers it has an extension for: Also offers Opera, which is not one of the checklist options; no Safari extension found.

Word, Google Docs, Outlook, Gmail and Slack add-ins: Also Apple Pages, LibreOffice, Apple Mail, Thunderbird (not checklist options). Outlook is marked BETA. No Overleaf or Slack found.

Phone keyboard that checks as you type: Only a dedicated iOS/macOS/Windows text-editor app was found; no keyboard-app or Android app was mentioned on the pages checked.

Teams and control8.0
+3.3 vs 4.7 avg12 of 15 points
Your own style guide and termsyes2.5 / 2.5
Team plan with shared settingsyes2 / 2
APIyes2 / 2
Single sign-onno0 / 2
Personal dictionaryyes1.5 / 1.5
Why these numbers

Your own style guide and terms: Team plan feature.

API: Linked in main nav and footer as its own product for businesses.

Single sign-on: Checked the Business page for SSO/SAML; not mentioned.

Privacy and security4.0
+0.3 vs 3.7 avg4 of 10 points
Does not train AI on your writingyes4 / 4
SOC 2no0 / 3
ISO 27001no0 / 3
Why these numbers

Does not train AI on your writing: Explicitly contrasted in the same policy with Quillbot (also owned by Learneo), which does train on user input by default.

SOC 2: Checked business and privacy pages for SOC 2; not mentioned.

ISO 27001: Checked business and privacy pages for ISO 27001; not mentioned.

yesnonot published average for AI writing assistants
How the Spec Score works

Scored from what LanguageTool publishes on its own site. Not a hands-on test.

Compared with 6 AI writing assistants. Facts checked 15 Sep 2026.

A fact the vendor does not publish gets half the points, or the typical value for a number, and says so. It never counts as a no. How we score.

LanguageTool is an AI writing tool for grammar and style across 30+ languages, built around privacy and GDPR compliance.

LanguageTool homepage screenshot
LanguageTool, Homepage

What is LanguageTool?

Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Hamburg, Germany, LanguageTool predates most of its competitors by years. Grammarly didn't launch until 2009. Ginger came later still. That history matters, not as a badge, but because the grammar engine reflects two-plus decades of iteration rather than a quick AI pivot. The core product is a grammar, style, and spelling checker spanning 30+ languages, including regional dialects. Six English variants alone. American, British, Australian, and a few others. That breadth is the actual product differentiator, not a marketing add-on. No direct competitor comes close on language count at this price. It runs across more surfaces than most people expect. Browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Opera. Desktop apps for macOS and Windows. Integrations for Google Docs, Microsoft Word, and LibreOffice. Email client support covers Gmail, Outlook, and Thunderbird, among a few others. Wide net. Honestly, the coverage is impressive. Whether the depth justifies it depends entirely on what you're writing, and in what language.

LanguageTool Features: What You Actually Get

LanguageTool features screenshot
LanguageTool, Features
The checking engine handles grammar, punctuation, spelling, and style suggestions in real time. Picky Mode adds a stricter layer on top. Writers who want softer nudges leave it off. Writers who want the tool to push back harder, particularly on style, turn it on. There's an AI paraphrasing tool with four modes. Formal, fluent, simple, and concise. This is sentence-level reworking, not content generation. That distinction matters. LanguageTool is not a content creation platform, and users who come in expecting something adjacent to Jasper or Wordtune's more generative end will leave disappointed. The personal dictionary is a small feature that earns consistent praise in reviews. Technical writers and researchers, specifically, get to stop fighting the tool over field-specific vocabulary. A Style Guide feature lives at the Premium and Teams tiers, letting users set rules for terminology and word choice. Teams can share one style guide across users. Not deep brand voice management, but something functional. No plagiarism checker. No SEO layer. No templates or content briefs. Worth being direct about that.

LanguageTool AI Output Quality: Is It Good Enough?

The grammar engine holds up well across review sources. Non-native English speakers appear repeatedly in positive reviews. Not as an edge case. As a core user group. The paraphrasing tool is where we get more cautious. It produces clean output, though the suggestions can occasionally flatten tone. Formal mode is the main offender. Useful for dry professional documents, less useful for anything that needs personality. We're skeptical of the more ambitious AI claims on the homepage. The grammar checking, though? Hard to argue with. The proprietary AI model has no disclosed benchmark data, no model card, nothing. The grammar engine is the mature product. The AI additions feel newer, less proven. That tracks. A tool founded in 2003 doesn't suddenly have two decades of AI experience.

Is LanguageTool Easy to Use?

Setup is fast. Install the browser extension, and it's active almost immediately across whatever you're typing into. The Chrome Web Store currently shows two million users for the extension, though LanguageTool's own marketing pages still reference "over three million." That discrepancy appears to reflect outdated copy rather than current numbers. The web editor is clean. Minimal. Word count, basic document stats, nothing cluttered. Most professional users seem to land in the Google Docs or Microsoft Word integrations. Both work without much friction. The learning curve is genuinely low, which counts for something on a tool operating across this many platforms and user types. Fair. Passable. Not great.

LanguageTool Pricing: Is It Worth the Cost?

LanguageTool pricing screenshot
LanguageTool, Pricing
The free plan is functional, not a demo. Grammar and spelling checks, the browser extensions, limited suggestions per check. Heavy users will hit the cap fast, but light users may not need more. Premium starts at $4.99 per month on a two-year commitment. That's a real price, not a teaser rate. Quarterly Premium runs $16.63 per month. The Teams plan, which adds the shared Style Guide and collaboration features, comes in at $11.07 per month per user at the two-user minimum. Against Grammarly's $12 per month entry point on an annual plan, LanguageTool Premium undercuts it by a meaningful margin. The value question is whether the multilingual support and GDPR-compliant data handling are worth anything to your specific situation. For European businesses or anyone writing outside English, the answer leans yes. Enterprise and API pricing are custom. No public numbers. Standard.

LanguageTool vs Grammarly: Which Is Better?

Direct take. Grammarly is better at English. Specifically American English. The suggestions are more nuanced, tone detection is more developed, and the plagiarism checker adds a layer LanguageTool doesn't offer at any tier. LanguageTool is better at most everything else. Thirty-plus languages, GDPR compliance, a lower price point, and integrations covering LibreOffice and Thunderbird. Grammarly touches neither. A monolingual English writer working in Google Docs who wants deep style feedback should pick Grammarly. A team writing in German or French, or any European business with data privacy requirements, has a stronger case for LanguageTool. ProWritingAid is worth naming as a third option. It goes deeper on style analysis for long-form writing than either of these two. Different tool, different use case.

Who Should Use LanguageTool? (And Who Shouldn't)

Non-native English speakers. Clearest fit. The tool catches L2 writing errors that other checkers miss. Multilingual professionals and teams operating under GDPR are the other strong fit. The data handling is cleaner than most American competitors, and that matters in regulated environments. Not a minor consideration for European businesses. Academic writers are a strong match for the tool. The tool handles long documents and dissertations without falling apart, which is more than can be said for tools built primarily around short-form or marketing content. Our review of Paperpal covers a tool built specifically for academic manuscript preparation, which goes further on citation formatting if that's the primary need. Solo English bloggers chasing SEO. Not the fit. Marketers needing bulk content generation, also not the fit. No SEO layer, no generation features, no templates.

LanguageTool Review Verdict

Competent, focused, and self-aware about what it is. LanguageTool doesn't try to generate full articles or manage content calendars. It checks writing. In 30-plus languages. At a price that undercuts the category leader. The multilingual support is the real differentiator and it isn't close, no other major grammar checker approaches that language count at this price point. That's not a minor edge. For the right user, it's the whole reason to be here. The weaknesses are real. The AI paraphrasing is thin compared to dedicated rewriting tools. Support is email and help center only, no live chat. For English-only, SEO-heavy, or content-generation-focused workflows, it's probably not enough. For everyone else, it deserves a serious look.

How LanguageTool compares

LanguageTool scores 5.2 out of 10 among the AI writing assistants we rate. These three do the same job and are the closest to it, compared on what each vendor publishes.

5.2LanguageTool
vs
8.3Grammarly

Grammarly

LanguageTool focuses on grammar and style checking, with no text generation, AI detection or humanizing feature; Grammarly offers all three. LanguageTool's Premium plan is $25.48 a month against Grammarly Pro's $30. LanguageTool states it does not train its AI on your writing at all, while Grammarly lets individual users opt out but defaults training on. Grammarly holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification; LanguageTool's business and privacy pages mention neither.

Pick Grammarly if you want AI text generation, detection and humanizing tools.
Pick LanguageTool if you want a cheaper plan with no AI training on your writing.

LanguageTool vs Grammarly →
5.2LanguageTool
vs
3.9ProWritingAid

ProWritingAid

LanguageTool's Premium plan is $25.48 a month, cheaper than ProWritingAid Premium's $30. LanguageTool includes a team plan with a shared style guide, an API and a personal dictionary; ProWritingAid's pricing page lists none of those four. ProWritingAid checks for plagiarism through separate credits, which LanguageTool does not offer at all. Both tools say they do not train their AI on your writing.

Pick ProWritingAid if you want plagiarism checking and don't need an API.
Pick LanguageTool if you want a team plan, API and lower monthly price.

LanguageTool vs ProWritingAid →
5.2LanguageTool
vs
5.8Wordtune

Wordtune

Wordtune writes new text from a prompt and offers a phone keyboard on iOS; LanguageTool does neither, focused instead on checking text you already have. LanguageTool includes an API and a personal dictionary, both missing from Wordtune's known facts. Wordtune's Advanced plan is $13.99 a month, well under LanguageTool Premium's $25.48. LanguageTool states it does not train its AI on your writing at all, while Wordtune lets users opt out but defaults training on.

Pick Wordtune if you want text generation and a phone keyboard at a lower price.
Pick LanguageTool if you want an API, personal dictionary and no AI training.

LanguageTool vs Wordtune →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LanguageTool free to use?

There's a functional free plan covering basic grammar, spelling, and punctuation checks through the browser extensions and web editor. It caps how many suggestions it surfaces per check, so heavy users will feel that limit quickly. Premium unlocks more suggestions, Picky Mode, and the Style Guide features.

Is LanguageTool better than Grammarly for non-English writing?

Yes, for most non-English writing. Grammarly focuses heavily on English and doesn't support the language range LanguageTool covers. Writers working in German, Spanish, French, or Portuguese will find LanguageTool more useful. For English-only writing, particularly American English, Grammarly's suggestions tend to be more refined.

Does LanguageTool work with Microsoft Word?

Yes. There's a native add-in for Microsoft Word alongside the macOS and Windows desktop apps. Google Docs and LibreOffice are also supported. The integration coverage is one of the broader ones we've tracked in this category, which explains how the tool has picked up users across such different workflows.
LanguageTool is featured in

Alternatives to LanguageTool

Other AI Writing Tool options we've reviewed.

Claude logo

Claude

Individuals, developers, teams, and enterprises needing advanced AI assistance for writing, coding, research, and complex reasoning

Not scored yet
Free plan: yesFree trial: noAPI: yes
From $0Free plan
Gemini logo

Gemini

Everyday productivity, creative work, and AI assistance at work, school, or home

Not scored yet
Free plan: yesFree trial: noAPI: yes
From $4.99Free plan
neuroflash logo

neuroflash

Marketing teams, content creators, and enterprise brands seeking AI content generation combined with predictive audience validation

6.1
Rank #3 of 6 AI copywriting tools
Best:Brand and content10
Weakest:Where the copy goes0
Does not train AI on your content: yesSOC 2: no
From $45 (€42)No free plan
100% from published facts · checked 15 Sep
Anyword logo

Anyword

GTM marketing teams, enterprise marketers, and performance-focused content creators

7.0
Rank #2 of 6 AI copywriting tools
Best:Teams and control10
Weakest:Pricing4
SOC 2: yes
From $49No free plan
94% from published facts · checked 15 Sep
Jasper AI logo

Jasper AI

Marketing teams, content marketers, and enterprise brands needing scalable, on-brand content creation

7.2
Rank #1 of 6 AI copywriting tools
Best:Where the copy goes10
Weakest:Pricing2.5
Does not train AI on your content: yesSOC 2: yes
From $69No free plan
100% from published facts · checked 15 Sep
WRITER logo

WRITER

Large organizations scaling agentic workflows with control and compliance

7.8
Rank #2 of 7 go-to-market platforms
Best:Building workflows10
Weakest:Support2.5
Test environments: yesSelf-hosted: yesBring your own key: yesAgent testing: no
Price not publishedNo free plan
70% from published facts · checked 13 Sep

User reviews

Review LanguageTool

Your rating

Reviews are moderated and appear once approved.