Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · workflow automation tools · facts checked 13 Sept 2026

Activepieces vs Workato

Workato scores 8.0 to Activepieces's 7.7 among the workflow automation tools we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Activepieces
#6 of 11 workflow automation tools
7.7
/ 10
From
$20/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
Workato
#4 of 11 workflow automation tools
8.0
/ 10
From
Not publicly stated
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Workato wins, 8.0 to 7.7

Workato's Agent Orchestration lets multiple agents hand off work to each other; each Activepieces agent works alone with no agent-to-agent handoff. Activepieces answers with infrastructure: self-hosting is available on every plan including the free tier, with EU hosting by default, while Workato has no self-hosted edition. Workato lists far more app connectors, 14,000 against Activepieces' 764. Both offer a visual builder, branching, and webhook triggers.

Pick Activepieces if you want to self-host and keep data in the EU.

Pick Workato if you need agents that hand off work to each other.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Solo builders and startups
Activepieces
Activepieces 10.0 · Workato 8.6 on building workflows and pricing
  • Free plan: Activepieces yes, Workato does not say
Ops teams connecting many apps
Workato
Activepieces 8.3 · Workato 9.5 on apps it connects to and reliability and control
  • App connectors: 14,000 apps against 764 apps
AI agent projects
Workato
Activepieces 4.0 · Workato 6.5 on ai agents
  • Agents that work together: Workato yes, Activepieces no
Enterprise IT and compliance
Workato
Activepieces 5.1 · Workato 5.8 on hosting and security and support
  • SOC 2: Workato yes, Activepieces no
  • Choice of data region: Us, eu, uk, jp, au against Eu
  • HIPAA: Workato yes, Activepieces does not say
  • But Activepieces leads on self-hosted edition: Activepieces yes, Workato no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other workflow automation tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Workato leads on 3 of 7 criteria.

AI agents20% of the score
Activepieces4.0
Workato6.5
Building workflows20% of the score
Activepieces10.0
Workato10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Activepieces10.0
Workato7.2
Apps it connects to15% of the score
Activepieces8.0
Workato10.0
Reliability and control10% of the score
Activepieces8.8
Workato8.8
Hosting and security10% of the score
Activepieces5.2
Workato6.2
Support5% of the score
Activepieces5.0
Workato5.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Agents that work together
Workato
Activepieces
No
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
App connectors
Workato
Activepieces
764 apps
source ↗
Workato
14,000 apps
source ↗
Self-hosted edition
Activepieces
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
No
source ↗
SOC 2
Workato
Activepieces
No
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Choice of data region
Workato
Activepieces
Eu
source ↗
Workato
Us, eu, uk, jp, au
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Activepieces
$20
source ↗
Workato
Not published
Cost of 1,000 five-step runs a month
Activepieces
$20
source ↗
Workato
Not published
Free plan
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Not published
Free trial
Activepieces
Does not apply
Workato
Not published
HIPAA
Activepieces
Not published
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Does not train AI on your data
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Not published
Ways to reach support
Activepieces
Email, community
source ↗
Workato
Not published
Where they match (8)
BYOK: bring your own model or key
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
What agents can learn from
Activepieces
Files, databases
source ↗
Workato
Files, databases
source ↗
Test and evaluate agents
Activepieces
No
source ↗
Workato
No
source ↗
Visual builder
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Branching and conditions
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Webhook triggers
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Separate test and live environments
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
Workato
Yes
source ↗
Run history kept on the cheapest plan
Activepieces
30 days
source ↗
Workato
30 days
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Activepieces

Free
Free
1,000 credits a month, unlimited flows, chat to automation, MCPs and API access
Plus
$20/mo
10,000 credits monthly, up to 5 users, bring your own AI keys
Team
$200/mo
50,000 credits monthly, 25 users, unlimited projects, SSO, standard roles, email support
Ultimate
Custom
Sized credits, dedicated workers, SCIM, audit logs, Git Sync, dedicated support; billed yearly

Workato

Free
Free
50K one-time credits
Pro - 2.5k credits
$75/mo
2.5k credits/month
Pro - 3.5k credits
$100/mo
3.5k credits/month
Pro - 10k credits
$275/mo
10k credits/month
Pro - 30k credits
$780/mo
30k credits/month
Pro - 50k credits
$1,250/mo
50k credits/month
Enterprise
Custom
Custom pricing available

For everything else about each tool, read the full Activepieces review and Workato review.

Section 04

Activepieces vs Workato: common questions

Which is better, Activepieces or Workato?

Workato scores 8.0 and Activepieces 7.7 out of 10 among the workflow automation tools we rate. Workato is ahead on aI agents, apps it connects to and hosting and security. Activepieces is ahead on pricing.

What can Activepieces do that Workato cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: self-hosted edition.

What can Workato do that Activepieces cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: agents that work together and sOC 2.

Keep comparing