Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · workflow automation tools · facts checked 28 Oct 2026

Activepieces vs n8n

n8n scores 8.8 to Activepieces's 7.7 among the workflow automation tools we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Activepieces
#6 of 11 workflow automation tools
7.7
/ 10
From
$20/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
n8n
#1 of 11 workflow automation tools
8.8
/ 10
From
$20/mo (Starter, billed yearly)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

n8n wins, 8.8 to 7.7

n8n agents can supervise and hand off tasks to other AI Agent Tool nodes, and n8n ships a dedicated Evaluations feature to test agent output against test cases; Activepieces agents work alone and Activepieces has no agent evaluation tool. Both self-host and default to EU hosting. Activepieces costs $20 a month on its cheapest paid plan against n8n's $25.92 a month, and keeps 30 days of run history against n8n's 7. Activepieces also adds email support alongside community, where n8n offers community only.

Pick Activepieces if you want longer run history and email support included.

Pick n8n if you need agents that hand off tasks and get evaluated.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Solo builders and startups
Activepieces
Activepieces 10.0 · n8n 9.4 on building workflows and pricing
  • Cost of 1,000 five-step runs a month: $20 against $24
  • Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $20 against $24
Ops teams connecting many apps
n8n
Activepieces 8.3 · n8n 9.0 on apps it connects to and reliability and control
  • App connectors: 2174 apps against 764 apps
  • But Activepieces leads on run history kept on the cheapest plan: 30 days against 7 days
AI agent projects
n8n
Activepieces 4.0 · n8n 10.0 on ai agents
  • Agents that work together: n8n yes, Activepieces no
  • Test and evaluate agents: n8n yes, Activepieces no
  • What agents can learn from: Files, website, notion, google_drive, database against Files, databases
Enterprise IT and compliance
n8n
Activepieces 5.1 · n8n 5.5 on hosting and security and support
  • SOC 2: n8n yes, Activepieces no
  • But Activepieces leads on ways to reach support: Email, community against Community
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other workflow automation tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. They split the criteria 3 each, with the rest level.

AI agents20% of the score
Activepieces4.0
n8n10.0
Building workflows20% of the score
Activepieces10.0
n8n10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Activepieces10.0
n8n8.8
Apps it connects to15% of the score
Activepieces8.0
n8n10.0
Reliability and control10% of the score
Activepieces8.8
n8n7.5
Hosting and security10% of the score
Activepieces5.2
n8n7.0
Support5% of the score
Activepieces5.0
n8n2.5
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

What agents can learn from
n8n
Activepieces
Files, databases
source ↗
n8n
Files, website, notion, google_drive, database
source ↗
Agents that work together
n8n
Activepieces
No
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Test and evaluate agents
n8n
Activepieces
No
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Activepieces
Activepieces
$20
source ↗
n8n
$24
source ↗
Cost of 1,000 five-step runs a month
Activepieces
Activepieces
$20
source ↗
n8n
$24
source ↗
App connectors
n8n
Activepieces
764 apps
source ↗
n8n
2174 apps
source ↗
Run history kept on the cheapest plan
Activepieces
Activepieces
30 days
source ↗
n8n
7 days
source ↗
SOC 2
n8n
Activepieces
No
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Ways to reach support
Activepieces
Activepieces
Email, community
source ↗
n8n
Community
source ↗

Published by only one of them

HIPAA
Activepieces
Not published
n8n
No
source ↗
Where they match (9)
BYOK: bring your own model or key
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Visual builder
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Branching and conditions
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Webhook triggers
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Separate test and live environments
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Self-hosted edition
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Choice of data region
Activepieces
Eu
source ↗
n8n
Eu
source ↗
Does not train AI on your data
Activepieces
Yes
source ↗
n8n
Yes
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Activepieces

Free
Free
1,000 credits a month, unlimited flows, chat to automation, MCPs and API access
Plus
$20/mo
10,000 credits monthly, up to 5 users, bring your own AI keys
Team
$200/mo
50,000 credits monthly, 25 users, unlimited projects, SSO, standard roles, email support
Ultimate
Custom
Sized credits, dedicated workers, SCIM, audit logs, Git Sync, dedicated support; billed yearly

n8n

Community Edition
Free
Self-hosted, unlimited workflows
Starter
$24/mo · $20/mo billed yearly
2,500 workflow executions a month
Pro
$60/mo · $50/mo billed yearly
10,000 workflow executions a month
Business
$960/mo · $800/mo billed yearly
Cloud or self-hosted
Enterprise
Custom
Contact sales

For everything else about each tool, read the full Activepieces review and n8n review.

Section 04

Activepieces vs n8n: common questions

Which is better, Activepieces or n8n?

n8n scores 8.8 and Activepieces 7.7 out of 10 among the workflow automation tools we rate. n8n is ahead on aI agents, apps it connects to and hosting and security. Activepieces is ahead on pricing, reliability and control and support.

Is Activepieces or n8n cheaper?

Activepieces's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo (Plus) and n8n's is $20/mo (Starter, billed yearly). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

Do Activepieces and n8n have a free plan?

Yes, both do.

What can n8n do that Activepieces cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: agents that work together, test and evaluate agents and sOC 2.

Keep comparing