UiPath vs Zapier
UiPath scores 8.8 to Zapier's 8.0 among the workflow automation tools we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
UiPath wins, 8.8 to 8.0
UiPath uniquely has 6 features · Zapier uniquely has 6 features.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: UiPath $25, Zapier $29.99
- Cost of 1,000 five-step runs a month: UiPath not published, Zapier $133.5
- App connectors: UiPath not published, Zapier 10,076 apps
- Run history kept on the cheapest plan: UiPath not published, Zapier 60 days
- Separate test and live environments: UiPath yes, Zapier does not say
- Agents that work together: UiPath yes, Zapier does not say
- Test and evaluate agents: UiPath yes, Zapier does not say
- Choice of data region: Us, eu, uk, ca, au, in, jp against Us
- Does not train AI on your data: Yes against unless you opt out
- Self-hosted edition: UiPath yes, Zapier does not say
- But Zapier leads on ways to reach support: Email, live_chat, community against Community
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other workflow automation tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. UiPath leads on 4 of 7 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
UiPath
Zapier
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
UiPath
- UiPath has nearly two decades of enterprise RPA experience, giving it a proven and stable automation foundation.
- The platform combines RPA robots, AI agents, and human-in-the-loop orchestration via Maestro into a unified automation loop.
- Named a Forrester Wave leader in document mining and analytics platforms as recently as 2025, indicating strong industry recognition.
- Supports 25+ languages and runs across web, Windows desktop, cloud, and on-premise environments for broad deployment flexibility.
- Acquisition of WorkFusion in 2025 deepened its capabilities specifically in financial services automation.
- A community of over 10 million users provides extensive peer support, shared resources, and third-party integrations.
- Enterprises who fully commit to the platform report strong enthusiasm and high satisfaction in G2 and Capterra reviews.
- Teams that underestimate setup complexity frequently report dissatisfaction, suggesting a steep and punishing onboarding curve.
- The platform's breadth makes it overkill for smaller teams or organizations without dedicated automation engineers.
- The 'agentic' rebranding is recent and may not yet reflect full maturity in AI agent capabilities relative to the legacy RPA core.
- On-premise and hybrid deployment configurations add infrastructure overhead that can slow down initial rollouts.
- The sheer volume of features makes selective evaluation difficult, increasing the risk of paying for capabilities you won't use.
- Review patterns suggest success is heavily dependent on organizational buy-in and proper resourcing, not just the tool itself.
Zapier
- Zapier integrates with over 9,000 apps, making it one of the largest integration libraries available on any automation platform.
- The visual workflow builder supports logic branches, conditional paths, and AI processing steps without requiring any coding knowledge.
- A built-in Code step supports JavaScript and Python, giving technical users more flexibility without needing a separate tool.
- The platform has expanded well beyond basic automation, now including AI agents, chatbots, native data tables, form tools, and a canvas builder.
- With 8 million users and over a decade of development since 2011, the platform is mature, stable, and extensively documented.
- Zapier handles simple trigger-and-action workflows extremely well, making it accessible for non-technical users automating everyday tasks.
- Users tend to stay not out of satisfaction but because rebuilding existing workflows on another platform is too costly and time-consuming.
- Most users only use a small fraction of available features, meaning they are effectively paying for capabilities they never touch.
- The platform has grown so large in surface area that pricing becomes difficult to justify for users with basic automation needs.
- Competitors like Make, n8n, Workato, and Microsoft Power Automate have eroded Zapier's near-monopoly in the no-code automation space.
- The gap between what Zapier has built and where most of its users actually operate suggests the product may be overbuilt for its average customer.
- Advanced features like AI agents and MCP connectivity may exist more on paper than in widespread, reliable real-world use based on community feedback.
UiPath vs Zapier: common questions
Which is better, UiPath or Zapier?
UiPath scores 8.8 and Zapier 8.0 out of 10 among the workflow automation tools we rate. UiPath is ahead on aI agents, pricing, reliability and control and hosting and security. Zapier is ahead on apps it connects to and support.
Is UiPath or Zapier cheaper?
UiPath's cheapest paid plan is $25/mo and Zapier's is $29.99/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do UiPath and Zapier have a free plan?
Yes, both do.