Make vs UiPath
UiPath scores 8.8 to Make's 7.1 among the workflow automation tools we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
UiPath wins, 8.8 to 7.1
UiPath uniquely has 6 features.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $10.59 against $25
- Separate test and live environments: UiPath yes, Make no
- Agents that work together: UiPath yes, Make no
- Test and evaluate agents: UiPath yes, Make no
- Self-hosted edition: UiPath yes, Make no
- HIPAA: UiPath yes, Make no
- Choice of data region: Us, eu, uk, ca, au, in, jp against Us, eu
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other workflow automation tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. UiPath leads on 3 of 7 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (7)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Make
UiPath
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Make
- The visual canvas builder lets users construct complex multi-step automation workflows without writing a single line of code.
- Routers, iterators, and aggregators enable branching, conditional logic, and array processing that most competing tools cannot handle.
- Real-time data flow visualization allows users to watch data move through each module as a scenario runs, making debugging more intuitive.
- Generous free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with paid plans starting at just $10.59 per month.
- Supports over 500,000 users and is considered a category fixture, not a fringe alternative to mainstream automation tools.
- Handles genuinely complicated, non-linear workflow logic that goes far beyond what linear automation tools like Zapier can manage.
- Consistently described by G2 reviewers as the most powerful no-code automation tool they have ever used.
- Steep learning curve means new users need significant time investment before they can use the platform effectively.
- The complexity of the interface can be overwhelming for users who only need simple, linear automations.
- The free plan is limited to just two active scenarios, which may not be sufficient for users with multiple automation needs.
- The rebrand from Integromat to Make in 2022 may cause confusion for users researching or referencing older documentation and tutorials.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed, making it difficult for larger teams to budget without contacting sales.
- The platform's power comes with a trade-off: the same features that enable advanced workflows add friction for straightforward use cases.
UiPath
- UiPath has nearly two decades of enterprise RPA experience, giving it a proven and stable automation foundation.
- The platform combines RPA robots, AI agents, and human-in-the-loop orchestration via Maestro into a unified automation loop.
- Named a Forrester Wave leader in document mining and analytics platforms as recently as 2025, indicating strong industry recognition.
- Supports 25+ languages and runs across web, Windows desktop, cloud, and on-premise environments for broad deployment flexibility.
- Acquisition of WorkFusion in 2025 deepened its capabilities specifically in financial services automation.
- A community of over 10 million users provides extensive peer support, shared resources, and third-party integrations.
- Enterprises who fully commit to the platform report strong enthusiasm and high satisfaction in G2 and Capterra reviews.
- Teams that underestimate setup complexity frequently report dissatisfaction, suggesting a steep and punishing onboarding curve.
- The platform's breadth makes it overkill for smaller teams or organizations without dedicated automation engineers.
- The 'agentic' rebranding is recent and may not yet reflect full maturity in AI agent capabilities relative to the legacy RPA core.
- On-premise and hybrid deployment configurations add infrastructure overhead that can slow down initial rollouts.
- The sheer volume of features makes selective evaluation difficult, increasing the risk of paying for capabilities you won't use.
- Review patterns suggest success is heavily dependent on organizational buy-in and proper resourcing, not just the tool itself.
Make vs UiPath: common questions
Which is better, Make or UiPath?
UiPath scores 8.8 and Make 7.1 out of 10 among the workflow automation tools we rate. UiPath is ahead on aI agents, reliability and control and hosting and security. Make is ahead on pricing and apps it connects to.
Is Make or UiPath cheaper?
Make's cheapest paid plan is $10.59/mo — Core and UiPath's is $25/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do Make and UiPath have a free plan?
Yes, both do.
What can UiPath do that Make cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: agents that work together, test and evaluate agents, separate test and live environments, self-hosted edition and hIPAA.