Make vs TaskMagic
Make scores 7.1 to TaskMagic's 5.6 among the workflow automation tools we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
Make wins, 7.1 to 5.6
Make reaches 1,000 five-step runs for $10.59 a month on its Core plan; the same basket costs $29 a month on TaskMagic. Make also has a free plan, where TaskMagic's entry point is a 7-day trial. TaskMagic keeps run history for 365 days by default, far longer than Make's 30, and connects to a stated 283 apps against Make's 3,000.
Pick Make if you want a free plan and the lowest monthly cost.
Pick TaskMagic if you want a year of run history kept by default.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Free plan: Make yes, TaskMagic no
- Cost of 1,000 five-step runs a month: $10.59 against $29
- Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $10.59 against $29
- App connectors: 3000 apps against 283 apps
- But TaskMagic leads on run history kept on the cheapest plan: 365 days against 30 days
- What agents can learn from: Files against None
- Ways to reach support: Email, community against Community
- But Make leads on does not train AI on your data: Yes against unless you opt out
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other workflow automation tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Make leads on 4 of 7 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (9)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Make
TaskMagic
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Make
- The visual canvas builder lets users construct complex multi-step automation workflows without writing a single line of code.
- Routers, iterators, and aggregators enable branching, conditional logic, and array processing that most competing tools cannot handle.
- Real-time data flow visualization allows users to watch data move through each module as a scenario runs, making debugging more intuitive.
- Generous free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with paid plans starting at just $10.59 per month.
- Supports over 500,000 users and is considered a category fixture, not a fringe alternative to mainstream automation tools.
- Handles genuinely complicated, non-linear workflow logic that goes far beyond what linear automation tools like Zapier can manage.
- Consistently described by G2 reviewers as the most powerful no-code automation tool they have ever used.
- Steep learning curve means new users need significant time investment before they can use the platform effectively.
- The complexity of the interface can be overwhelming for users who only need simple, linear automations.
- The free plan is limited to just two active scenarios, which may not be sufficient for users with multiple automation needs.
- The rebrand from Integromat to Make in 2022 may cause confusion for users researching or referencing older documentation and tutorials.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed, making it difficult for larger teams to budget without contacting sales.
- The platform's power comes with a trade-off: the same features that enable advanced workflows add friction for straightforward use cases.
TaskMagic
- Combines API-based app integrations and browser automation (RPA) in a single interface, which most competitors split into separate tools.
- AI generates step-by-step automation plans from plain English descriptions, lowering the barrier for non-technical users.
- Users can review and manually edit every AI-generated step before anything executes, giving full control over automation logic.
- Supports browser automation for sites that lack APIs, covering use cases that Zapier-style tools simply cannot handle.
- Covers core business app integrations including Google Sheets, Gmail, Slack, Stripe, HubSpot, and Salesforce.
- Supports conditional logic that is editable after the AI builds the initial workflow draft.
- Data transformation between apps and browser actions is supported, enabling real-world workflows rather than simple data movement.
- Offered at a price point where the API-plus-RPA combination is rare among direct competitors.
- Error handling specifics are notably absent from public documentation, making it hard to assess reliability for production workflows.
- Marketing claims appear misaligned with actual user experience based on Reddit and Product Hunt feedback.
- Homepage trust signals such as Microsoft and Salesforce logos could not be fully cross-referenced against verifiable use cases.
- The claimed integration count of 'thousands' could not be independently verified by researchers.
- The tool is relatively small in scale, meaning third-party coverage and independent validation are limited.
- No hands-on test data is available from this review, so real-world performance consistency remains uncertain.
Make vs TaskMagic: common questions
Which is better, Make or TaskMagic?
Make scores 7.1 and TaskMagic 5.6 out of 10 among the workflow automation tools we rate. Make is ahead on aI agents, pricing, apps it connects to and hosting and security. TaskMagic is ahead on reliability and control and support.
Is Make or TaskMagic cheaper?
Make's cheapest paid plan is $10.59/mo — Core and TaskMagic's is $29/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do Make and TaskMagic have a free plan?
Make does and TaskMagic does not.
What can Make do that TaskMagic cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: free plan.
