Head-to-head
Asana vs Glean
Asana uniquely has 11 features · Glean uniquely has 7 features.
The verdict
Asana or Glean?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Asana
Personal
Free
Up to 2 users, unlimited tasks/projects, list/board/calendar views, 100MB file limit
Starter
$13.49/mo · $131.88/yr
No user seat limits, Timeline/Gantt views, unlimited automations, forms, custom fields, AI Studio Basic w/50K credits/mo
Advanced
$30.49/mo · $299.88/yr
Unlimited portfolios, goals, workload, approvals/proofing, Salesforce/Tableau/Power BI, AI Studio Basic w/75K credits/mo
Enterprise+
Contact sales
Advanced security, compliance, SIEM integrations, data residency, audit logs, managed workspaces
Glean
Glean does not publish a plan list we could read.
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Asana
Pros
- Asana has been around since 2008 and serves 85% of the Fortune 100, demonstrating proven enterprise-grade reliability and maturity.
- The Asana Work Graph connects tasks, people, goals, and dependencies into a unified map, giving teams strong structural visibility across projects.
- Unlimited automations are available on paid plans with a no-code, point-and-click rules builder that operations teams consistently praise.
- The platform supports 25+ languages and runs on web, iOS, Android, and Chrome extension, making it highly accessible across devices and regions.
- The AI features represent a substantive product direction rather than a cosmetic pivot, with AI designed to perform work inside workflows.
- The free plan offers unlimited tasks and projects with no time limit, providing a genuine entry point for small teams to evaluate the tool.
- With 150,000+ organizations using Asana, the platform benefits from extensive third-party integrations and a large community of documented use cases.
Cons
- The free plan is limited to only 2 users, which is far more restrictive than Asana's own marketing language suggests.
- The 'human-agent teams' and AI positioning language reads as vendor-heavy, making it harder to assess what AI features actually deliver in practice.
- The platform has grown beyond simple task tracking into something harder to categorize, which can create onboarding complexity for new teams.
- User reviews on G2 and Capterra suggest real-world performance of the Work Graph concept doesn't always match the promise in vendor documentation.
- The homepage has gone through multiple AI-driven repositioning rewrites, signaling potential inconsistency in product focus or messaging clarity.
- Enterprise-scale pricing and feature gating may push smaller teams toward paid tiers quickly once they outgrow the two-user free plan.
Glean
Pros
- Connects to over 100 enterprise apps and builds a unified knowledge graph that understands company-specific context, not just generic information.
- Permission-aware architecture ensures users only receive answers sourced from content they are already authorized to access.
- Real-world deployments at massive scale — Booking.com (14,000 employees) and Ericsson (20,000 employees) signal proven enterprise reliability.
- Natural language search returns answers with cited sources and full context, reducing time wasted hunting through siloed tools.
- Company-specific knowledge indexing means the AI understands internal project names, terminology, and history that generic LLMs cannot.
- Agentic AI capabilities now allow the tool to execute tasks across connected apps, not just surface information passively.
- Backed by a strong customer list including Zillow and GCash, indicating broad enterprise applicability across industries.
Cons
- Pricing structure is described as patience-testing, suggesting high cost or opaque procurement before you even access the product.
- Built for a very specific buyer profile — enterprises with large headcounts — making it a poor fit for smaller organizations.
- No hands-on trial was available for this review, meaning real-world UX nuances may differ from documented and reported behavior.
- G2 reviews were found to contradict each other, suggesting inconsistent user experiences across different deployments.
- Vendor marketing was noted as overstated relative to actual user reports, raising questions about feature reliability or ease of implementation.
- The shift toward agentic capabilities is recent, meaning that layer of the product is less battle-tested than the core search functionality.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2008 | 2019 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| AI model | Proprietary | Multi-model (supports 100+ LLMs including GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and others via Model Hub) |
| User base | 150,000+ organizations including 85% of Fortune 100 | Millions of enterprise users (customers include Booking.com 14k employees, Ericsson 20k+ employees, Zillow, GCash, TIME) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Chrome | Web, iOS, Android, Chrome Extension, Slack, Microsoft Teams |
| Languages | 25+ | 25+ |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | — |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $13.49/mo | — |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | Custom pricing — contact sales |
| All plans | Personal — Free Starter — $13.49/mo Advanced — $30.49/mo Enterprise+ — Contact sales | — |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Teams managing projects and portfolios across departments | Enterprise teams seeking AI-powered workplace search and knowledge management |
| Differentiator | Pre-built AI Teammates (20+) including Launch Planner, Workflow Optimizer, Compliance Specialist, Status Reporter, and Data Quality Manager | Trusted answers grounded in company data with turnkey AI ecosystem implementation on one centralized platform |
| Competitors | Monday.com, Notion, ClickUp, Jira, Smartsheet | Microsoft Copilot, Notion AI, Guru, Coveo, Elasticsearch, Perplexity for Enterprise, Moveworks |
| Features | ||
| AI Powered Search | — | ✓ |
| Agent/Workflow Capabilities | — | ✓ |
| Approvals and Proofing | ✓ | — |
| Custom Data Sources | — | ✓ |
| Goals Tracking | ✓ | — |
| Google Calendar Connector | — | ✓ |
| Hundreds of Direct Connectors | — | ✓ |
| Saml Authentication | ✓ | — |
| Salesforce/Tableau/Power Bi Support | ✓ | — |
| Timeline and Gantt Views | ✓ | — |
| Workload Management | ✓ | — |
| Zapier Integration | — | ✓ |
| AI Assistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar Integration | ✓ | — |
| Document Creation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Note Taking | ✓ | — |
| Offline Mode | — | ✕ |
| Project Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Research Assistant | — | ✓ |
| Spreadsheet AI | ✓ | — |
| Task Automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Calendar | ✓ | — |
| Google Drive | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | Slack, Google Drive, Google Calendar, Microsoft 365, Zoom, Salesforce, Tableau, Power BI, Zapier, Jira, GitHub, Dropbox, Adobe Creative Cloud | Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, GitHub, Salesforce, plus 100+ connectors via Connectors platform |
| Microsoft 365 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Slack Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zapier | ✓ | — |
Keep comparing
More Asana matchups
