Head-to-head · facts checked 13 Sept 2026
Gumloop vs Make
Each tool covers a slightly different feature mix. Scan the table below to compare.
From
$37/mo — Pro
Free plan
No — 14-day free trial of Pro only
From
$10.59/mo — Core
Free plan
Yes — Free plan with 1
The verdict
Gumloop or Make?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Gumloop
Free
Free
5k credits/month, 1 seat, 1 active trigger, 2 concurrent runs, 5 concurrent agent interactions
Pro
$37/mo (up to $1,840/mo) · $360/yr (up to $17,664/yr)
20k+ credits/month, unlimited seats, 5 concurrent runs, 25 concurrent agent interactions, MCP Server Hosting (1)
Enterprise
Custom
Custom credits, RBAC, SCIM/SAML, VPC, audit logs, AI model access control, dedicated support
Make
Core
$10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) · $108/yr (up to $2,185.96/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 300,000 credits/mo); unlimited active scenarios, Make API access
Pro
$18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) · $192/yr (up to $57,736/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); priority execution, custom variables, full-text log search
Teams
$34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) · $348/yr (up to $98,772/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); teams and team roles, create and share scenario templates
Enterprise
Custom
Custom pricing; custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, overage protection
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Gumloop
Pros
- Canvas-based visual workflow builder makes it easy to design complex multi-step AI processes without writing code.
- Supports multiple AI models including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and DeepSeek, giving teams flexibility in model choice.
- Includes code sandboxes, which is rare for no-code tools and allows teams to extend functionality beyond standard nodes.
- Offers a range of trigger options including webhooks, scheduled runs, email, Slack, form submissions, and an API.
- Built-in conditional logic and a workflow queuing system with error handling and policy application.
- Backed by a $50M Series B led by Benchmark, signaling strong investor confidence and likely continued development.
- Positioned as an AI agent orchestrator rather than a simple task automator, targeting a more sophisticated automation use case.
Cons
- Total number of native integrations is not publicly disclosed, making it hard to evaluate compatibility before committing.
- MCP integrations are mentioned without any clear count or documentation transparency.
- The sophistication of the error handling system could not be independently verified from public information.
- This review is based entirely on research rather than hands-on testing, so real-world performance remains unconfirmed.
- As a two-year-old company, Gumloop is still early-stage and may carry product maturity and stability risks.
- The vague integration list around Salesforce, Slack, BigQuery, and Gmail lacks detail on depth or reliability of those connections.
Make
Pros
- The visual canvas builder lets users construct complex multi-step automation workflows without writing a single line of code.
- Routers, iterators, and aggregators enable branching, conditional logic, and array processing that most competing tools cannot handle.
- Real-time data flow visualization allows users to watch data move through each module as a scenario runs, making debugging more intuitive.
- Generous free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with paid plans starting at just $10.59 per month.
- Supports over 500,000 users and is considered a category fixture, not a fringe alternative to mainstream automation tools.
- Handles genuinely complicated, non-linear workflow logic that goes far beyond what linear automation tools like Zapier can manage.
- Consistently described by G2 reviewers as the most powerful no-code automation tool they have ever used.
Cons
- Steep learning curve means new users need significant time investment before they can use the platform effectively.
- The complexity of the interface can be overwhelming for users who only need simple, linear automations.
- The free plan is limited to just two active scenarios, which may not be sufficient for users with multiple automation needs.
- The rebrand from Integromat to Make in 2022 may cause confusion for users researching or referencing older documentation and tutorials.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed, making it difficult for larger teams to budget without contacting sales.
- The platform's power comes with a trade-off: the same features that enable advanced workflows add friction for straightforward use cases.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | Prague, Czech Republic |
| AI model | OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek (multi-model) | OpenAI GPT (via integration), proprietary orchestration |
| User base | — | 500K+ |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Languages | English only | 25+ |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | No — 14-day free trial of Pro only | Yes — Free plan with 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios |
| Free trial | Yes — 14-day free trial of Pro | Yes — Free plan available indefinitely |
| Starting price | $37/mo — Pro | $10.59/mo — Core |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
| All plans | Free — Free Pro — $37/mo (up to $1,840/mo) Enterprise — Custom | Core — $10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) Pro — $18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) Teams — $34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) Enterprise — Custom |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Business teams and enterprises building AI agents and automating workflows without deep engineering expertise | No-code/low-code automation builders, SMBs, agencies, and enterprises needing visual workflow automation |
| Differentiator | Gumloop combines a visual canvas for multi-agent workflow orchestration with enterprise-grade security (VPC, ZDR, SOC 2 Type II) and a unified AI gateway (Gumstack) that monitors and audits all AI activity across your organization. | Make's visual drag-and-drop scenario builder with advanced data mapping, iterators, and routers provides unmatched flexibility for complex multi-step automations without code. |
| Competitors | n8n, Zapier, Relevance AI, Dust, Glean, Make | Zapier, n8n, Workato, Tray.io, Power Automate |
| Features | ||
| AI Agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Code | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data Transform | ✓ | ✓ |
| Error Handling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Execution Logs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Human in Loop | ✓ | ✓ |
| Num Integrations | — | 3,000+ |
| Scheduled Runs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trigger Types | Webhook / schedule (recurring) / email / Slack / form submission / API | webhook / schedule / instant (real-time) / polling / email / RSS / watch |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Salesforce, BigQuery | OpenAI, Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Airtable |
| Openai Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhook Support | ✓ | ✓ |
Section 03
Gumloop vs Make: common questions
Is Gumloop or Make cheaper?
Gumloop's cheapest paid plan is $37/mo — Pro and Make's is $10.59/mo — Core. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Gumloop matchups
