Head-to-head · facts checked 13 Sept 2026
CrewAI vs Make
CrewAI uniquely has 6 features · Make uniquely has 1 feature.
From
$10.59/mo — Core
Free plan
Yes — Free plan with 1
The verdict
CrewAI or Make?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
CrewAI
Basic
Free
50 workflow executions/month, visual editor, GitHub integration, AI copilot
Enterprise
Custom
Unlimited executions, dedicated VPC, SSO, RBAC, on-site support, 50 hours dev/month
Make
Core
$10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) · $108/yr (up to $2,185.96/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 300,000 credits/mo); unlimited active scenarios, Make API access
Pro
$18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) · $192/yr (up to $57,736/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); priority execution, custom variables, full-text log search
Teams
$34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) · $348/yr (up to $98,772/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); teams and team roles, create and share scenario templates
Enterprise
Custom
Custom pricing; custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, overage protection
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
CrewAI
Pros
- Supports both no-code visual editor and code-first Python API, making it accessible to non-developers and engineers alike.
- All visual editor work exports to Python, preventing vendor lock-in and enabling clean handoffs to engineering teams.
- Open-source foundation is active on GitHub, giving developers transparency, community support, and a free entry point.
- Already embedded in 63% of Fortune 500 companies according to the vendor, suggesting strong enterprise credibility.
- Supports multiple LLMs including OpenAI and Anthropic, offering flexibility in how the platform is configured.
- Multi-agent orchestration enables complex task completion that single LLM prompts cannot achieve alone.
- Enterprise control plane layered on top of open-source allows teams to start free and scale up to commercial tier naturally.
Cons
- Not listed on G2 or Capterra yet, making it difficult to find verified third-party user reviews or ratings.
- Trying to serve both no-code and developer audiences simultaneously risks being a poor fit for both if execution falls short.
- No hands-on testing data available from independent reviewers, so real-world performance claims are hard to verify.
- The dual-path approach (visual editor plus code-first API) adds complexity that teams must evaluate carefully before committing.
- Enterprise positioning means it is unlikely to be cost-effective or appropriate for small teams or solo developers.
- Born in 2023, the platform is still very young, and long-term stability and support are unproven.
Make
Pros
- The visual canvas builder lets users construct complex multi-step automation workflows without writing a single line of code.
- Routers, iterators, and aggregators enable branching, conditional logic, and array processing that most competing tools cannot handle.
- Real-time data flow visualization allows users to watch data move through each module as a scenario runs, making debugging more intuitive.
- Generous free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with paid plans starting at just $10.59 per month.
- Supports over 500,000 users and is considered a category fixture, not a fringe alternative to mainstream automation tools.
- Handles genuinely complicated, non-linear workflow logic that goes far beyond what linear automation tools like Zapier can manage.
- Consistently described by G2 reviewers as the most powerful no-code automation tool they have ever used.
Cons
- Steep learning curve means new users need significant time investment before they can use the platform effectively.
- The complexity of the interface can be overwhelming for users who only need simple, linear automations.
- The free plan is limited to just two active scenarios, which may not be sufficient for users with multiple automation needs.
- The rebrand from Integromat to Make in 2022 may cause confusion for users researching or referencing older documentation and tutorials.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed, making it difficult for larger teams to budget without contacting sales.
- The platform's power comes with a trade-off: the same features that enable advanced workflows add friction for straightforward use cases.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | Prague, Czech Republic |
| AI model | Multi-LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, and others) | OpenAI GPT (via integration), proprietary orchestration |
| User base | 63% of Fortune 500 + large developer community | 500K+ |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, API | Web |
| Languages | English primarily | 25+ |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes — Free plan with 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes — Free plan available indefinitely |
| Starting price | Free — Basic | $10.59/mo — Core |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
| All plans | Basic — Free Enterprise — Custom | Core — $10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) Pro — $18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) Teams — $34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) Enterprise — Custom |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Enterprises and developers building, deploying, and managing multi-agent AI workflows | No-code/low-code automation builders, SMBs, agencies, and enterprises needing visual workflow automation |
| Differentiator | The only platform combining no-code visual builder, code-first API, and a full enterprise control plane (tracing, RBAC, human-in-the-loop, LLM optimization) for multi-agent workflows — used by 63% of the Fortune 500. | Make's visual drag-and-drop scenario builder with advanced data mapping, iterators, and routers provides unmatched flexibility for complex multi-step automations without code. |
| Competitors | LangChain, AutoGen, n8n, Make, Zapier, LlamaIndex | Zapier, n8n, Workato, Tray.io, Power Automate |
| Features | ||
| Github Integration | ✓ | — |
| Pii Redaction | ✓ | — |
| Rbac | ✓ | — |
| SSO | ✓ | — |
| Vpc Deployment | ✓ | — |
| Visual Editor and AI Copilot | ✓ | — |
| AI Agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Code | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data Transform | ✓ | ✓ |
| Error Handling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Execution Logs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Human in Loop | ✓ | ✓ |
| Num Integrations | Standard tools, enterprise connectors, MCP server export, UI component export; exact count not stated | 3,000+ |
| Scheduled Runs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trigger Types | Webhook / schedule (cron) / Slack/Teams / API / human-in-loop gates | webhook / schedule / instant (real-time) / polling / email / RSS / watch |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Workspace | — | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Arize, Galileo, DataDog, Patronus, Okta, Microsoft Entra | OpenAI, Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Airtable |
| Openai Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhook Support | ✓ | ✓ |
Section 03
CrewAI vs Make: common questions
Is CrewAI or Make cheaper?
CrewAI's cheapest paid plan is Free — Basic and Make's is $10.59/mo — Core. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More CrewAI matchups
