Head-to-head · facts checked 13 Sept 2026
Lindy vs Make
Make uniquely has 8 features · Lindy uniquely has 6 features.
From
$10.59/mo — Core
Free plan
Yes — Free plan with 1
The verdict
Lindy or Make?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Lindy
Plus
$49.99/mo
Standard usage, up to 2 inboxes, email drafting, meeting scheduling, notes, 100+ integrations, iMessage/SMS chat
Pro
$99.99/mo
3x more usage than Plus, up to 3 inboxes, computer use, pick the AI model
Max
$199.99/mo
7x more usage than Plus, up to 5 inboxes, everything in Pro
Enterprise
Custom
Everything in Max plus shared usage, dedicated support, HIPAA, SSO/SCIM, audit logs, custom onboarding
Make
Core
$10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) · $108/yr (up to $2,185.96/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 300,000 credits/mo); unlimited active scenarios, Make API access
Pro
$18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) · $192/yr (up to $57,736/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); priority execution, custom variables, full-text log search
Teams
$34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) · $348/yr (up to $98,772/yr)
10k credits/mo (up to 8 million credits/mo); teams and team roles, create and share scenario templates
Enterprise
Custom
Custom pricing; custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, overage protection
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Lindy
Pros
- Works through natural language text messages via iMessage or SMS, eliminating the need for a separate dashboard or app.
- Draft-then-approve model ensures the AI never sends emails without user confirmation, reducing risk of unintended communication.
- Covers the core knowledge worker stack with integrations for Gmail, Outlook, Google Calendar, Slack, and Notion.
- Handles the most time-consuming tasks in one place: email drafting, meeting scheduling, follow-ups, and meeting notes.
- Meeting prep briefings pull from calendar and inbox context automatically, saving manual research time.
- Simple, focused feature set means there is no complex flow canvas or UI configuration required to get started.
- Human-in-the-loop design is a deliberate and smart choice for professionals cautious about AI autonomy.
Cons
- Pricing is steep relative to comparable tools in the scheduling and workflow automation space.
- Transparency around key features is thin, making it difficult to fully evaluate capabilities before committing.
- No clear information about API access or webhook support, limiting extensibility for technical users.
- Sits awkwardly between consumer AI assistant and business automation tool, creating unclear positioning.
- Limited to five core task types, which may not satisfy users needing broader automation coverage.
- Android users are limited to SMS interaction, which offers a less seamless experience than iMessage on iPhone.
Make
Pros
- The visual canvas builder lets users construct complex multi-step automation workflows without writing a single line of code.
- Routers, iterators, and aggregators enable branching, conditional logic, and array processing that most competing tools cannot handle.
- Real-time data flow visualization allows users to watch data move through each module as a scenario runs, making debugging more intuitive.
- Generous free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and two active scenarios, with paid plans starting at just $10.59 per month.
- Supports over 500,000 users and is considered a category fixture, not a fringe alternative to mainstream automation tools.
- Handles genuinely complicated, non-linear workflow logic that goes far beyond what linear automation tools like Zapier can manage.
- Consistently described by G2 reviewers as the most powerful no-code automation tool they have ever used.
Cons
- Steep learning curve means new users need significant time investment before they can use the platform effectively.
- The complexity of the interface can be overwhelming for users who only need simple, linear automations.
- The free plan is limited to just two active scenarios, which may not be sufficient for users with multiple automation needs.
- The rebrand from Integromat to Make in 2022 may cause confusion for users researching or referencing older documentation and tutorials.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed, making it difficult for larger teams to budget without contacting sales.
- The platform's power comes with a trade-off: the same features that enable advanced workflows add friction for straightforward use cases.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | Prague, Czech Republic |
| AI model | GPT-4, Claude, Gemini Flash, Claude Sonnet | OpenAI GPT (via integration), proprietary orchestration |
| User base | — | 500K+ |
| Platforms | Web, iOS (iMessage), Android (SMS) | Web |
| Languages | English primary | 25+ |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | No | Yes — Free plan with 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes — Free plan available indefinitely |
| Starting price | $29.99/mo — Plus | $10.59/mo — Core |
| Enterprise | Yes | Custom |
| Refund policy | Cancel anytime; access retained through end of billing period; no explicit refund policy stated | — |
| All plans | Plus — $49.99/mo Pro — $99.99/mo Max — $199.99/mo Enterprise — Custom | Core — $10.59/mo (up to $241.31/mo) Pro — $18.82/mo (up to $5,660.47/mo) Teams — $34.12/mo (up to $9,683.59/mo) Enterprise — Custom |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | AI assistant automation for meetings, email, and workflows | No-code/low-code automation builders, SMBs, agencies, and enterprises needing visual workflow automation |
| Differentiator | Selectable AI model provider on Pro plan; runs custom Python/JavaScript in workflows | Make's visual drag-and-drop scenario builder with advanced data mapping, iterators, and routers provides unmatched flexibility for complex multi-step automations without code. |
| Competitors | Zapier, Make, Superhuman, Reclaim.ai, Motion, HubSpot AI | Zapier, n8n, Workato, Tray.io, Power Automate |
| Features | ||
| 100+ Integrations | ✓ | — |
| Email Drafting | ✓ | — |
| Meeting Note Taking | ✓ | — |
| Meeting Scheduling | ✓ | — |
| Run Code (Python/Js) | ✓ | — |
| Slack Integration | ✓ | — |
| AI Agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Webhooks | — | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Code | — | ✓ |
| Data Transform | ✓ | ✓ |
| Error Handling | — | ✓ |
| Execution Logs | — | ✓ |
| Human in Loop | ✓ | ✓ |
| Num Integrations | 100+ | 3,000+ |
| Scheduled Runs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trigger Types | email / schedule / SMS/iMessage / calendar events | webhook / schedule / instant (real-time) / polling / email / RSS / watch |
| Visual Builder | ✕ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | — | ✓ |
| Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | Gmail, Outlook, Google Calendar, Slack, Notion | OpenAI, Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Airtable |
| Openai Integration | — | ✓ |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhook Support | — | ✓ |
Section 03
Lindy vs Make: common questions
Is Lindy or Make cheaper?
Lindy's cheapest paid plan is $29.99/mo — Plus and Make's is $10.59/mo — Core. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Lindy matchups
