Circleback vs Fathom
Circleback scores 8.6 to Fathom's 8.0 among the AI meeting assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 4 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
Circleback wins, 8.6 to 8.0
Circleback uniquely has 12 features · Fathom uniquely has 8 features.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Meeting apps it records: 6 meeting apps against 3 meeting apps
- Languages it transcribes: 100 languages against 38 languages
- But Fathom leads on talk time and coaching insights: Fathom yes, Circleback no
- Where it runs: 5 platforms against 4 platforms
- Cheapest paid plan, monthly: $18 against $19
- Does not train AI on your data: Yes against unless you opt out
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other AI meeting assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Circleback leads on 4 of 4 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (8)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Circleback
Fathom
For everything else about each tool, read the full Circleback review and Fathom review.
Circleback vs Fathom: common questions
Which is better, Circleback or Fathom?
Circleback scores 8.6 and Fathom 8.0 out of 10 among the AI meeting assistants we rate. Circleback is ahead on what it captures, where it works, pricing and privacy and trust.
Is Circleback or Fathom cheaper?
Circleback's cheapest paid plan is $18/mo (Pro) and Fathom's is $19/mo (Team). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do Circleback and Fathom have a free plan?
Yes, both do.
What can Fathom do that Circleback cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: talk time and coaching insights.
