Avoma vs Krisp
Avoma scores 7.0 to Krisp's 6.8 among the AI meeting assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
Avoma wins, 7.0 to 6.8
Neither Avoma nor Krisp offers a real free plan, only a trial, but Krisp is the cheaper entry point at $16 a month against Avoma's $29. Avoma adds talk time tracking and coaching insights that Krisp does not have, and includes an API where Krisp has none. Krisp shows you a live transcript while the call is still running.
Pick Avoma if you want talk time tracking and API access included.
Pick Krisp if you want the cheaper start at a lower monthly price.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Talk time and coaching insights: Avoma yes, Krisp no
- Languages it transcribes: 70 languages against 17 languages
- API: Avoma yes, Krisp no
- But Krisp leads on where it runs: 4 platforms against 3 platforms
- Cheapest paid plan, monthly: $16 against $29
- Data can stay in the EU: Avoma no, Krisp not published
- Ways to reach support: 3 support channels against 2 support channels
- Tells participants it is recording: Avoma yes, Krisp does not say
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other AI meeting assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Avoma leads on 2 of 4 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (7)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Avoma
Krisp
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Avoma
- Startup, the cheapest paid plan, includes unlimited real-time transcription, unlimited AI summary notes and unlimited recording storage.
- Bot-less native recording is available alongside the standard meeting bot.
- Notes save automatically to connected CRM records from the Startup plan.
- Transcripts and translations cover more than 70 languages.
- There is no free plan that records meetings, only a 14-day trial.
- Global Ask Avoma, which searches across all of a user's meetings, is limited to the Enterprise plan.
- Full Conversation Intelligence, including AI call scoring and coaching, is sold as a separate paid add-on rather than included in any core plan.
Krisp
- Krisp works directly at the audio level on your device, so no bot needs to join the call by default.
- Krisp never uses your meeting data to train its AI models.
- Unlimited AI note-taking, transcription and recording are included from the Core plan, the cheapest paid tier.
- MCP integration with Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor is included from the Core plan.
- There is no permanent free plan; the only no-cost option is a 7-day trial.
- Krisp does not currently offer an open API for direct integrations without Zapier.
- HIPAA compliance with BAA signing is only for Enterprise teams of 100 or more seats, and single sign-on is Enterprise-only.
Avoma vs Krisp: common questions
Which is better, Avoma or Krisp?
Avoma scores 7.0 and Krisp 6.8 out of 10 among the AI meeting assistants we rate. Avoma is ahead on what it captures and where it works. Krisp is ahead on pricing.
Is Avoma or Krisp cheaper?
Avoma's cheapest paid plan is $29/mo (Startup) and Krisp's is $16/mo (Core). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do Avoma and Krisp have a free plan?
Neither has a free plan.
What can Avoma do that Krisp cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: talk time and coaching insights and aPI.
