Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 19 Oct 2026

Cline vs Cursor

Cursor scores 8.2 to Cline's 7.2 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Cline
#6 of 15 AI coding assistants
7.2
/ 10
From
Free for individuals
Free plan
Yes
Cursor
#2 of 15 AI coding assistants
8.2
/ 10
From
$8/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Cursor wins, 8.2 to 7.2

This is not a features argument, it is a commitment argument. Cursor is a fork of VS Code, which means adopting it replaces your editor. Cline is an open-source agent that runs inside the editor you already have, and also from the command line and as an SDK. Both are good. They ask very different things of you.

Pick Cline if you want to keep your setup, or if you need control over which model runs and where. It is fully open source and model-agnostic, so you can point it at GPT, Claude or a self-hosted open-weights model, and there is no subscription to the tool itself. That also means the cost is your model usage rather than a flat fee, which is cheaper for light use and not necessarily cheaper for heavy use.

Pick Cursor if you want the AI to be the primary interface rather than a panel inside your editor, and you are willing to switch editors to get it. Because it is a VS Code fork, your extensions and keybindings come with you. The agentic features that run, test and deploy end to end are the reason people move, and they are hard to match from a plugin.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
Cursor
Cline 4.5 · Cursor 10.0 on agents and your codebase
  • Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests: Cursor yes, Cline no
  • Suggests code as you type: Cursor yes, Cline no
Developers paying their own way
Too close to call
Cline 10.0 · Cursor 7.8 on pricing
Teams that pick their own models
Cline
Cline 8.5 · Cursor 8.0 on model freedom
  • Runs models on your own machine: Cline yes, Cursor no
  • But Cursor leads on aI model families you can choose: Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own against Claude, gpt, gemini
Companies strict about code privacy
Cursor
Cline 6.7 · Cursor 7.3 on privacy and security and where it works
  • Option to keep no copy of your code: Cursor yes, Cline no
  • SOC 2: Cursor yes, Cline no
  • But Cline leads on open source: Cline yes, Cursor no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Cline leads on 3 of 5 criteria.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Cline4.5
Cursor10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Cline10.0
Cursor7.8
Model freedom20% of the score
Cline8.5
Cursor8.0
Privacy and security20% of the score
Cline5.0
Cursor7.5
Where it works15% of the score
Cline9.0
Cursor7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
Cursor
Cline
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Suggests code as you type
Cursor
Cline
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
AI model families you can choose
Cursor
Cline
Claude, gpt, gemini
source ↗
Cursor
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Unless you opt out
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
Cursor
Cline
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
SOC 2
Cursor
Cline
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Open source
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Cline
Does not apply
Cursor
$30
source ↗
Editors and terminals it works in
Cline
Cli, vscode, jetbrains, own editor
source ↗
Cursor
Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor
source ↗
Where they match (6)
Understands your whole codebase
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Reviews pull requests
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Cline
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Legal cover for generated code
Cline
No
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Cline

Free
Free
Open source core free; you pay your own model provider

Cursor

Free
Free
Limited agent and Chat requests, Cursor's own models only
Plus
$8/mo · $80/yr
Base weekly usage pool shared with Grok, Grok models only (no Claude, GPT or Gemini), no cloud agents or Bugbot; includes Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine, Build and X Premium perks
Premium
$30/mo · $300/yr
4x Plus usage, latest Grok models, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot code reviews, Claude, GPT and Gemini at API list price billed separately
Super
$100/mo · $1,000/yr
15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
Ultra
$200/mo · $2,000/yr
50x Plus usage, earliest access to new products and models
Teams
$30/mo/user
Premium, Super or Ultra seats at $30, $100 or $200, mix and match; centralized billing, usage analytics, team privacy settings, SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom
Pooled usage across the team, invoice billing, SCIM, granular spend controls, audit logs, priority support

For everything else about each tool, read the full Cline review and Cursor review.

What each one actually costs

Cursor's coding plan, Premium, is $30/mo, with a free tier and an $8 Plus plan that runs only Cursor's own Grok models. Cline is free for individuals, but that is the tool being free, not the work: you supply the model, so your bill is whatever tokens you spend. For occasional use that is a fraction of $30. For all-day agentic work it can be considerably more.

The part worth knowing before you switch

Cursor requires replacing your editor entirely. It is not a plugin. If you are deeply invested in a current setup, that is a real cost even though the VS Code lineage softens it.

Cline's usage numbers are hard to verify. It has no structured presence on G2 or Capterra, and the developer count it reports comes from its own homepage. That is not a mark against the software, but it does mean you are evaluating on the code rather than on independent user data.

If you cannot decide

Cline is the lower-risk trial, because installing it changes nothing about how you work. Try it first. If you find yourself wanting the AI to drive the whole session rather than assist inside it, that is the signal to look at Cursor.

Section 04

Cline vs Cursor: common questions

Is Cline actually free?

The tool is, for individuals, and it is open source. You pay for model usage separately because Cline is model-agnostic and you bring your own key. Light use costs very little; heavy agentic use can exceed a flat subscription.

Do I have to give up VS Code to use Cursor?

In practice yes, though the transition is gentler than it sounds. Cursor is a fork of VS Code, so your extensions, keybindings and muscle memory carry over. But it is a separate application, not something you add to your existing install.

Can I run a self-hosted model?

With Cline, yes. Model-agnostic support including self-hosted open-weights models is one of its main design goals. Cursor supports multiple frontier models but is not built around running your own.

Keep comparing