Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 19 Oct 2026

Augment Code vs Cursor

Cursor scores 8.2 to Augment Code's 6.3 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 4 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Augment Code
#13 of 15 AI coding assistants
6.3
/ 10
From
$20/mo (Standard plan)
Free plan
No
Cursor
#2 of 15 AI coding assistants
8.2
/ 10
From
$8/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Cursor wins, 8.2 to 6.3

Cursor Premium costs $30 a month per user and there is a free plan to start; Augment Code's Standard plan is $20 a month but priced flat for the whole team, with no free plan available. On Premium and up, Cursor lets you bring your own API key for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure or Bedrock, and its Privacy Mode can keep no copy of your code stored; Augment offers neither option. Both tools review pull requests and understand your whole codebase.

Pick Augment Code if your whole team wants one flat price with no per-seat billing.

Pick Cursor if you want a free plan and control over your own API key.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
Cursor
Augment Code 8.8 · Cursor 10.0 on agents and your codebase
  • Suggests code as you type: Cursor yes, Augment Code does not say
Developers paying their own way
Cursor
Augment Code 5.0 · Cursor 7.8 on pricing
  • Free plan: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
  • But Augment Code leads on monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $20 against $30
Teams that pick their own models
Cursor
Augment Code 4.5 · Cursor 8.0 on model freedom
  • Bring your own API key: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
  • AI model families you can choose: Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own against Claude, gpt, gemini, grok
Companies strict about code privacy
Cursor
Augment Code 6.4 · Cursor 7.3 on privacy and security and where it works
  • Option to keep no copy of your code: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
  • Runs on your own servers or cloud: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
  • But Augment Code leads on legal cover for generated code: Augment Code yes, Cursor no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Cursor leads on 4 of 5 criteria.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Augment Code8.8
Cursor10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Augment Code5.0
Cursor7.8
Model freedom20% of the score
Augment Code4.5
Cursor8.0
Privacy and security20% of the score
Augment Code6.0
Cursor7.5
Where it works15% of the score
Augment Code7.0
Cursor7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Augment Code
Augment Code
$20
source ↗
Cursor
$30
source ↗
Free plan
Cursor
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
AI model families you can choose
Cursor
Augment Code
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok
source ↗
Cursor
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Cursor
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Augment Code
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Unless you opt out
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
Cursor
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Cursor
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Legal cover for generated code
Augment Code
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Suggests code as you type
Augment Code
Not published
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Free trial
Augment Code
Not published
Cursor
Does not apply
Editors and terminals it works in
Augment Code
Vscode, jetbrains, neovim, cli
source ↗
Cursor
Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor
source ↗
Where they match (6)
Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Understands your whole codebase
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Reviews pull requests
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
SOC 2
Augment Code
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Open source
Augment Code
No
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Augment Code

Standard
$20/mo
$20/mo of usage across LLM, Context Engine and compute; top-ups available
Business
$100/mo
$100/mo of usage across LLM, Context Engine and compute; top-ups available
Enterprise
Custom
Custom usage limits, volume discounts, SSO, dedicated support

Cursor

Free
Free
Limited agent and Chat requests, Cursor's own models only
Plus
$8/mo · $80/yr
Base weekly usage pool shared with Grok, Grok models only (no Claude, GPT or Gemini), no cloud agents or Bugbot; includes Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine, Build and X Premium perks
Premium
$30/mo · $300/yr
4x Plus usage, latest Grok models, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot code reviews, Claude, GPT and Gemini at API list price billed separately
Super
$100/mo · $1,000/yr
15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
Ultra
$200/mo · $2,000/yr
50x Plus usage, earliest access to new products and models
Teams
$30/mo/user
Premium, Super or Ultra seats at $30, $100 or $200, mix and match; centralized billing, usage analytics, team privacy settings, SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom
Pooled usage across the team, invoice billing, SCIM, granular spend controls, audit logs, priority support

For everything else about each tool, read the full Augment Code review and Cursor review.

Section 04

Augment Code vs Cursor: common questions

Which is better, Augment Code or Cursor?

Cursor scores 8.2 and Augment Code 6.3 out of 10 among the AI coding assistants we rate. Cursor is ahead on agents and your codebase, pricing, model freedom and privacy and security.

Is Augment Code or Cursor cheaper?

Augment Code's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo (Standard plan) and Cursor's is $8/mo (Plus). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

Do Augment Code and Cursor have a free plan?

Cursor does and Augment Code does not.

What can Augment Code do that Cursor cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: legal cover for generated code.

What can Cursor do that Augment Code cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: free plan, bring your own API key, option to keep no copy of your code and runs on your own servers or cloud.

Keep comparing