Augment Code vs Cursor
Cursor scores 8.4 to Augment Code's 6.3 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 4 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
Cursor wins, 8.4 to 6.3
Cursor Pro costs $20 a month per user and includes a free plan to start; Augment Code's Standard plan is also $20 a month but priced flat for the whole team, with no free plan available. Cursor lets you bring your own API key for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure or Bedrock, and its Privacy Mode can keep no copy of your code stored; Augment offers neither option. Both tools review pull requests and understand your whole codebase.
Pick Augment Code if your whole team wants one flat price with no per-seat billing.
Pick Cursor if you want a free plan and control over your own API key.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Suggests code as you type: Cursor yes, Augment Code does not say
- Free plan: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
- Bring your own API key: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
- AI model families you can choose: Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own against Claude, gpt, gemini, grok
- Option to keep no copy of your code: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
- Runs on your own servers or cloud: Cursor yes, Augment Code no
- But Augment Code leads on legal cover for generated code: Augment Code yes, Cursor no
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Cursor leads on 4 of 5 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (7)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Augment Code
Cursor
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Augment Code
- The Context Engine maps codebases as a structural graph rather than a text corpus, enabling support for repositories with 400,000+ files.
- PR Author agent handles the full workflow from first commit through merge, not just code generation.
- The Tester expert runs end-to-end changes and posts results with screenshots, a level of specificity most competing tools skip.
- Three distinct code review modes (Deep Code Review, Pair Review, and PR Risk Analysis) give teams flexible oversight options.
- PR Risk Analysis surfaces security vulnerabilities before a human reviews the code, with a claimed 60%+ automatic CVE remediation rate.
- The Cosmos platform enables shared memory and coordinated AI agents across an entire engineering organization.
- Built enterprise-first with agentic workflows that span from incident detection all the way through merge.
- The tool is expensive and clearly not positioned for solo developers or small teams on tight budgets.
- Very limited independent user reviews exist on platforms like G2, making third-party validation difficult.
- The 60%+ CVE auto-remediation claim is striking but has not been stress-tested across diverse codebases in public documentation.
- As a company founded in 2022, the product's long-term reliability and enterprise track record is still relatively unproven.
- The breadth of the feature surface and agentic complexity may introduce a steep learning curve for engineering teams adopting it.
- The enterprise-first focus means smaller or mid-market teams may find the product over-engineered for their needs.
Cursor
- Cursor is a full IDE fork of VS Code, preserving familiar muscle memory, extensions, and keybindings while deeply integrating AI as the primary interface.
- Supports multiple frontier AI models including GPT-4.5, Claude Opus, Google Gemini, and Grok, letting developers choose the right model for each task.
- Codebase indexing builds a semantic map of the entire project so AI responses are informed by the whole repo, not just the currently open file.
- Tab completions are context-aware and capable of multi-line, multi-thought suggestions rather than single-line autocomplete.
- Version 2.0 introduced parallel agents and background agents, expanding what can be automated within a single development session.
- Adopted at scale by enterprises like NVIDIA across 40,000 engineers, indicating enterprise-grade reliability and team-level viability.
- The integrated experience feels more cohesive than plugin-based alternatives because AI is rebuilt into the editor core, not bolted on.
- Cursor requires replacing your existing editor entirely rather than functioning as a plugin, which is a significant commitment for developers invested in their current setup.
- This review is based on secondary research including vendor documentation and pricing pages rather than direct hands-on testing, which limits the depth of certain findings.
- Locking into a full IDE fork creates dependency risk if Cursor's development pace slows or pricing changes substantially.
- Developers who prefer a lightweight or highly customized editor environment may find the VS Code base restrictive even with extensions available.
- The breadth of model options, while a strength, may create decision fatigue for teams that want a simple, opinionated default workflow.
- As a relatively young company founded in 2022, long-term enterprise support guarantees and roadmap stability are less proven than established IDE vendors.
Augment Code vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Augment Code or Cursor?
Cursor scores 8.4 and Augment Code 6.3 out of 10 among the AI coding assistants we rate. Cursor is ahead on agents and your codebase, pricing, model freedom and privacy and security.
Is Augment Code or Cursor cheaper?
Augment Code's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo (Standard plan) and Cursor's is $20/mo (Pro). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Do Augment Code and Cursor have a free plan?
Cursor does and Augment Code does not.
What can Augment Code do that Cursor cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: legal cover for generated code.
What can Cursor do that Augment Code cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: free plan, bring your own API key, option to keep no copy of your code and runs on your own servers or cloud.
