Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 14 Sept 2026

Cline vs GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot scores 8.5 to Cline's 7.2 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Cline
#6 of 13 AI coding assistants
7.2
/ 10
From
Free for individuals
Free plan
Yes
GitHub Copilot
#1 of 13 AI coding assistants
8.5
/ 10
From
Free (GitHub Copilot Free, 2,000 completions a month)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

GitHub Copilot wins, 8.5 to 7.2

GitHub Copilot's most-used and most-reliable feature is autocomplete, and it is genuinely very good at it, trained on the largest body of real code anywhere. Cline is built for a different unit of work: you describe a task and it executes across files. Both have agent ambitions. Only one of them has a decade of GitHub behind its suggestions.

Pick Cline if you want an agent that does the whole job and you want control over how. It is fully open source, model-agnostic including self-hosted models, and runs as a VS Code extension, a CLI or an SDK — so you can embed it in your own tooling. Free for individuals, with model usage billed separately.

Pick GitHub Copilot if you mainly want faster typing inside the editor you already use, and you want it working today. The free tier gives 2,000 completions a month, it is integrated across the whole GitHub lifecycle including security scanning, and its contextual depth from real repositories is something standalone tools cannot easily match.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
GitHub Copilot
Cline 4.5 · GitHub Copilot 10.0 on agents and your codebase
  • Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests: GitHub Copilot yes, Cline no
  • Suggests code as you type: GitHub Copilot yes, Cline no
Developers paying their own way
Too close to call
Cline 10.0 · GitHub Copilot 10.0 on pricing
Teams that pick their own models
Cline
Cline 8.5 · GitHub Copilot 7.5 on model freedom
  • Runs models on your own machine: Cline yes, GitHub Copilot no
  • But GitHub Copilot leads on aI model families you can choose: Claude, gpt, gemini, grok against Claude, gpt, gemini
Companies strict about code privacy
GitHub Copilot
Cline 6.7 · GitHub Copilot 7.1 on privacy and security and where it works
  • Option to keep no copy of your code: GitHub Copilot yes, Cline no
  • SOC 2: GitHub Copilot yes, Cline no
  • Legal cover for generated code: GitHub Copilot yes, Cline no
  • But Cline leads on runs on your own servers or cloud: Cline yes, GitHub Copilot no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. They split the criteria 2 each, with the rest level.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Cline4.5
GitHub Copilot10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Cline10.0
GitHub Copilot10.0
Model freedom20% of the score
Cline8.5
GitHub Copilot7.5
Privacy and security20% of the score
Cline5.0
GitHub Copilot6.5
Where it works15% of the score
Cline9.0
GitHub Copilot8.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
GitHub Copilot
Cline
No
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Suggests code as you type
GitHub Copilot
Cline
No
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
AI model families you can choose
GitHub Copilot
Cline
Claude, gpt, gemini
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
No
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Unless you opt out
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
GitHub Copilot
Cline
No
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
No
source ↗
SOC 2
GitHub Copilot
Cline
No
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Legal cover for generated code
GitHub Copilot
Cline
No
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Editors and terminals it works in
GitHub Copilot
Cline
Cli, vscode, jetbrains, own editor
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Cli, vscode, jetbrains, visual_studio, neovim, xcode
source ↗
Open source
Cline
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Cline
Does not apply
GitHub Copilot
$10
source ↗
Where they match (4)
Understands your whole codebase
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Reviews pull requests
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Cline
Yes
source ↗
GitHub Copilot
Yes
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Cline

Free
Free
Open source core free; you pay your own model provider

GitHub Copilot

Free
Free
Up to 2,000 completions a month, choice of several models
Pro
$10/mo
Access to Cloud agent and code review, Unlimited code completion and next edit suggestions, Access to 3rd party agents (Claude Code and Codex), Model selection, $15 monthly total credits for Pro
Pro+
$39/mo
Access to premium models, including Opus, Audit logs, 4x+ included usage than Pro, $70 monthly total credits for Pro+
Max
$100/mo
Priority access to new models and features, 2.9x+ included usage than Pro+, $200 monthly total credits for Max

For everything else about each tool, read the full Cline review and GitHub Copilot review.

Where Copilot is strongest, and where it is not

Autocomplete is the part reviewers consistently praise. The parts to be sceptical about are at the other end: agent mode for multi-step autonomous work is unproven and may not behave as advertised in real workflows, and Copilot struggles with unusual architectures or strongly opinionated codebases, where suggestions get less relevant. If your codebase is conventional, that plays to its strengths. If it is idiosyncratic, expect more friction.

Where Cline asks more of you

Cline gives you control and expects you to use it: you choose the model, you manage the cost, and there is no flat subscription smoothing it out. It also has no G2 or Capterra presence, so there is no independent review base, and its 8 million developer figure is self-reported. The code is open, which is a different and in some ways better kind of evidence, but it is not the same as other people's experience.

Cost shape

Copilot has a free tier at 2,000 completions a month and predictable paid plans. Cline is free as software and variable as a bill. Light use makes Cline cheaper; sustained agentic work does not necessarily.

Running both

There is no conflict in doing so. Copilot for inline completion while you type, Cline when you have a task worth handing over whole.

Section 04

Cline vs GitHub Copilot: common questions

Is GitHub Copilot free?

There is a free tier with up to 2,000 completions per month, which is enough for light use. Heavier use needs a paid plan.

Which is better for a large refactor?

Cline is designed for multi-step work across files, which is what a refactor is. Copilot's agent mode targets the same territory but is described in our review as unproven for multi-step autonomous tasks.

Does either work with a self-hosted model?

Cline does, including open-weights models you run yourself. That matters if your code cannot be sent to a third party. Copilot is a hosted GitHub service.

Keep comparing