Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 19 Oct 2026

Cursor vs Tabnine

Cursor scores 8.2 to Tabnine's 7.5 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Cursor
#2 of 15 AI coding assistants
8.2
/ 10
From
$8/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
Tabnine
#4 of 15 AI coding assistants
7.5
/ 10
From
$39/user/mo (Tabnine Code Assistant, annual subscription, quote required)
Free plan
No
The verdict

Cursor wins, 8.2 to 7.5

If your code cannot leave your infrastructure, this comparison is already over. Tabnine can be deployed fully air-gapped with nothing leaving your network, and it is the only AI coding assistant offering a standalone Enterprise Context Engine that learns your organisation's architecture and conventions. Cursor is the more capable day-to-day tool. It is also a hosted service.

Pick Cursor if you are choosing on capability and hosted is fine. It is a full VS Code fork with agentic, parallel and cloud agents that build, test and deploy end to end, and it supports multiple frontier models (third-party ones from Premium up) so you are not tied to one. Your extensions and keybindings survive the move. $30/mo for Premium, with a free tier.

Pick Tabnine if compliance is the constraint. Fully air-gapped deployment with zero data leaving your infrastructure is the reason it exists, and the Enterprise Context Engine learns architecture, naming conventions and framework preferences across the whole team rather than per file. Note the free plan was discontinued in April 2025.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
Cursor
Cursor 10.0 · Tabnine 8.0 on agents and your codebase
  • Reviews pull requests: Cursor yes, Tabnine no
Developers paying their own way
Cursor
Cursor 7.8 · Tabnine 3.0 on pricing
  • Free plan: Cursor yes, Tabnine no
  • Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $30 against $39
Teams that pick their own models
Tabnine
Cursor 8.0 · Tabnine 9.5 on model freedom
  • Runs models on your own machine: Tabnine yes, Cursor no
  • But Cursor leads on aI model families you can choose: Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own against Claude, gpt, gemini, own
Companies strict about code privacy
Tabnine
Cursor 7.3 · Tabnine 8.7 on privacy and security and where it works
  • Legal cover for generated code: Tabnine yes, Cursor no
  • Does not train AI on your code: Yes against unless you opt out
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. They split the criteria 2 each, with the rest level.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Cursor10.0
Tabnine8.0
Pricing20% of the score
Cursor7.8
Tabnine3.0
Model freedom20% of the score
Cursor8.0
Tabnine9.5
Privacy and security20% of the score
Cursor7.5
Tabnine10.0
Where it works15% of the score
Cursor7.0
Tabnine7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Reviews pull requests
Cursor
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
No
source ↗
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Cursor
Cursor
$30
source ↗
Tabnine
$39
source ↗
Free plan
Cursor
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
No
source ↗
AI model families you can choose
Cursor
Cursor
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own
source ↗
Tabnine
Claude, gpt, gemini, own
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Tabnine
Cursor
No
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Tabnine
Cursor
Unless you opt out
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Legal cover for generated code
Tabnine
Cursor
No
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Free trial
Cursor
Does not apply
Tabnine
0 days
source ↗
Editors and terminals it works in
Cursor
Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor
source ↗
Tabnine
Vscode, jetbrains, visual_studio, cli
source ↗
Where they match (8)
Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Understands your whole codebase
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Suggests code as you type
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
SOC 2
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Tabnine
Yes
source ↗
Open source
Cursor
No
source ↗
Tabnine
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Cursor

Free
Free
Limited agent and Chat requests, Cursor's own models only
Plus
$8/mo · $80/yr
Base weekly usage pool shared with Grok, Grok models only (no Claude, GPT or Gemini), no cloud agents or Bugbot; includes Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine, Build and X Premium perks
Premium
$30/mo · $300/yr
4x Plus usage, latest Grok models, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot code reviews, Claude, GPT and Gemini at API list price billed separately
Super
$100/mo · $1,000/yr
15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
Ultra
$200/mo · $2,000/yr
50x Plus usage, earliest access to new products and models
Teams
$30/mo/user
Premium, Super or Ultra seats at $30, $100 or $200, mix and match; centralized billing, usage analytics, team privacy settings, SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom
Pooled usage across the team, invoice billing, SCIM, granular spend controls, audit logs, priority support

Tabnine

Code Assistant
— · $468/yr
Agnetic Platform
— · $708/yr

For everything else about each tool, read the full Cursor review and Tabnine review.

Three things to know about Tabnine before you shortlist it

The free plan is gone. It was removed in April 2025, which materially changes the case for solo developers and indie users who previously started there.

Pricing is genuinely opaque. Our review uses that word. You cannot evaluate cost without a conversation, which is normal for enterprise sales and still a real friction if you are comparing.

Trustpilot scores raise questions. Worth reading before committing a team, particularly since the third-party evidence base is where an enterprise purchase usually gets scrutinised.

Evidence quality, since this is an enterprise decision

Worth being straight about, because a purchase at this level gets scrutinised. Our Cursor assessment draws on documentation, G2 and Reddit rather than sustained hands-on use, so treat its agentic claims as well documented rather than independently confirmed by us. Tabnine's difficulty is the opposite shape: the capability is verifiable and the satisfaction data is what raises questions.

Either way, the free tier on Cursor and a proof of concept on Tabnine will tell you more than anyone's review, including this one.

When the question is not compliance

If your code can go to a hosted service, Cursor is the stronger tool and it publishes its price. Tabnine's advantages are almost entirely about where it runs and what it knows about your organisation, and those are enterprise concerns. Buying Tabnine without needing air-gapped deployment means paying an enterprise motion for a feature you will not use.

Section 04

Cursor vs Tabnine: common questions

Can Tabnine run without internet access?

Yes. Fully air-gapped deployment with zero data leaving your infrastructure is its defining capability, and the main reason to choose it over more capable hosted alternatives.

Does Tabnine still have a free plan?

No. It was discontinued in April 2025, which significantly changes the proposition for solo and indie developers.

What is the Enterprise Context Engine?

A standalone component that learns your organisation's architecture, naming conventions and framework preferences across the whole team rather than from individual files. Tabnine is the only assistant offering it as a standalone.

Keep comparing