Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 19 Oct 2026

Aider vs Cursor

Cursor scores 8.2 to Aider's 6.4 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Aider
#11 of 15 AI coding assistants
6.4
/ 10
From
Free, Open Source
Free plan
Yes
Cursor
#2 of 15 AI coding assistants
8.2
/ 10
From
$8/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Cursor wins, 8.2 to 6.4

Aider is free and open source, so the only cost is the LLM API usage you bring; Cursor's paid plans start at $8 a month, but Bugbot, cloud agents and Claude, GPT and Gemini start at $30 for Premium. Cursor reviews pull requests through Bugbot and can spawn cloud agents that run remotely, neither of which Aider offers. Aider connects to more model families, including DeepSeek, while Cursor sticks to Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and its own models.

Pick Aider if you want more model choice and no monthly subscription.

Pick Cursor if you want pull request review and a dedicated code editor built in.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
Cursor
Aider 2.5 · Cursor 10.0 on agents and your codebase
  • Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests: Cursor yes, Aider no
  • Reviews pull requests: Cursor yes, Aider no
  • Suggests code as you type: Cursor yes, Aider no
Developers paying their own way
Too close to call
Aider 10.0 · Cursor 7.8 on pricing
Teams that pick their own models
Aider
Aider 10.0 · Cursor 8.0 on model freedom
  • Runs models on your own machine: Aider yes, Cursor no
Companies strict about code privacy
Cursor
Aider 5.1 · Cursor 7.3 on privacy and security and where it works
  • SOC 2: Cursor yes, Aider no
  • Editors and terminals it works in: Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor against Cli
  • Option to keep no copy of your code: Cursor yes, Aider does not say
  • But Aider leads on open source: Aider yes, Cursor no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Cursor leads on 3 of 5 criteria.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Aider2.5
Cursor10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Aider10.0
Cursor7.8
Model freedom20% of the score
Aider10.0
Cursor8.0
Privacy and security20% of the score
Aider6.0
Cursor7.5
Where it works15% of the score
Aider4.0
Cursor7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
Cursor
Aider
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Reviews pull requests
Cursor
Aider
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Suggests code as you type
Cursor
Aider
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Aider
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Aider
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Unless you opt out
source ↗
SOC 2
Cursor
Aider
No
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Editors and terminals it works in
Cursor
Aider
Cli
source ↗
Cursor
Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor
source ↗
Open source
Aider
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Aider
Does not apply
Cursor
$30
source ↗
AI model families you can choose
Aider
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, deepseek
source ↗
Cursor
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
Aider
Not published
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Where they match (5)
Understands your whole codebase
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Aider
Yes
source ↗
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Legal cover for generated code
Aider
No
source ↗
Cursor
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Aider

Free
Free
Free open source; you pay only your own model costs
Open Source / Free
Free
Free to install; user pays only their own LLM API costs (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, etc.)

Cursor

Free
Free
Limited agent and Chat requests, Cursor's own models only
Plus
$8/mo · $80/yr
Base weekly usage pool shared with Grok, Grok models only (no Claude, GPT or Gemini), no cloud agents or Bugbot; includes Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine, Build and X Premium perks
Premium
$30/mo · $300/yr
4x Plus usage, latest Grok models, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot code reviews, Claude, GPT and Gemini at API list price billed separately
Super
$100/mo · $1,000/yr
15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
Ultra
$200/mo · $2,000/yr
50x Plus usage, earliest access to new products and models
Teams
$30/mo/user
Premium, Super or Ultra seats at $30, $100 or $200, mix and match; centralized billing, usage analytics, team privacy settings, SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom
Pooled usage across the team, invoice billing, SCIM, granular spend controls, audit logs, priority support

For everything else about each tool, read the full Aider review and Cursor review.

Section 04

Aider vs Cursor: common questions

Which is better, Aider or Cursor?

Cursor scores 8.2 and Aider 6.4 out of 10 among the AI coding assistants we rate. Cursor is ahead on agents and your codebase, privacy and security and where it works. Aider is ahead on pricing and model freedom.

Is Aider or Cursor cheaper?

Aider's cheapest paid plan is Free, Open Source and Cursor's is $8/mo (Plus). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

Do Aider and Cursor have a free plan?

Yes, both do.

What can Aider do that Cursor cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: runs models on your own machine and open source.

What can Cursor do that Aider cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests, reviews pull requests, suggests code as you type and sOC 2.

Keep comparing