Head-to-head
Midjourney vs Shakker
Midjourney uniquely has 8 features · Shakker uniquely has 2 features.
The verdict
Midjourney or Shakker?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Midjourney
Basic
$10/mo · $96/yr
Limited generations (~200 image jobs / month)
Standard
$30/mo · $288/yr
SD and HD video generation
Pro
$60/mo · $576/yr
SD and HD video generation
Mega
$120/mo · $1,152/yr
SD and HD video generation
Shakker
Basic
$12/mo · $100/yr
15,000 Tokens per month
Advanced
$30/mo · $288/yr
35,000 Tokens per month
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Midjourney
Pros
- Midjourney consistently produces visually rich, cinematic, and atmospheric images that outperform most competitors on pure output quality.
- V8 Alpha offers five times faster generation than V6, making the workflow significantly quicker for high-volume users.
- Default 2K resolution output provides high-quality images suitable for professional creative projects without extra steps.
- Text rendering within images has noticeably improved in recent model versions, addressing a long-standing weakness.
- The web interface has genuinely improved the experience beyond the original Discord-only model.
- A large and active user base of over 20 million means extensive community resources, tutorials, and prompt-sharing are readily available.
- Adopted by artists, designers, and creative directors as a legitimate part of professional workflows, signaling real-world reliability.
Cons
- The product's Discord roots result in a learning curve tied to command syntax rather than intuitive software design.
- The interface and onboarding experience still feels unconventional compared to standard SaaS creative tools.
- Midjourney runs on a proprietary model, limiting flexibility and transparency compared to open-source alternatives like Stable Diffusion.
- It lacks the enterprise-focused features and integrations that Adobe Firefly offers for larger organizations.
- Text-in-image rendering, while improved, still lags behind specialized challengers like Ideogram.
- Output style leans toward a recognizable aesthetic that may not suit all creative briefs or brand needs.
Shakker
Pros
- Runs powerful headline models including FLUX.1 and Stable Diffusion XL, offering a genuinely high quality ceiling for photorealism and detailed outputs.
- Includes a browser-based online A1111 WebUI and ComfyUI, eliminating the need for local installation and GPU overheating issues.
- Supports SD 1.5 for users still working with older fine-tuned models, making it backward compatible with existing workflows.
- Has a built-in online LoRA training pipeline, allowing users to create and train their own custom models without external tools.
- Community and model-sharing infrastructure similar to Civitai, enabling discovery and sharing of custom models within the platform.
- Targets power users who already understand prompt construction, CFG scale, and LoRA models, making it a specialist-grade tool.
- No local setup required for complex tools like ComfyUI, which is a meaningful convenience for technically experienced users.
Cons
- Almost entirely unknown outside of Stable Diffusion enthusiast circles, with very limited public review data to validate claims at scale.
- Output quality floor depends heavily on the user's prompt engineering skills, making it poorly suited for beginners or casual users.
- Only two G2 reviews on record averaging 4.0 out of 5, providing an insufficient sample size to identify consistent quality patterns.
- Community momentum is unconfirmed, meaning the model-sharing and gallery features may lack the active user base needed to be genuinely useful.
- Positioned in a crowded AI image generation market without a clear differentiating aesthetic identity compared to tools like Midjourney.
- Research could not be validated through hands-on testing, leaving real-world performance and reliability questions partially unanswered.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | — |
| AI model | Proprietary (Midjourney V6.1 / V7 / V8 Alpha) | FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion XL, SD 1.5 (multi-model platform) |
| User base | 20M+ | — |
| Platforms | Web, Discord | Web |
| Languages | English primary (multilingual prompt support) | English, Chinese (at minimum) |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No (discontinued March 2023) | — |
| Starting price | $10/mo (Basic) | $12/mo - Basic |
| Enterprise | Custom | — |
| Refund policy | No refunds (strict no-refund policy) | — |
| All plans | Basic — $10/mo Standard — $30/mo Pro — $60/mo Mega — $120/mo | Basic — $12/mo Advanced — $30/mo |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Artists, designers, and creatives seeking high-aesthetic AI image generation | AI artists, designers, and creators seeking a community-driven image generation platform with diverse models and fine-tuning support |
| Differentiator | Midjourney sets the aesthetic benchmark for AI image generation with its distinctive cinematic, painterly style and is widely regarded as producing the most visually stunning outputs in the industry. | Shakker combines a streaming AI image generator with an online A1111 WebUI, ComfyUI, and online model training in a community-driven platform featuring exclusive FLUX.1 and SDXL LoRA models. |
| Competitors | DALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Ideogram, Leonardo AI | Civitai, Leonardo.ai, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion WebUI |
| Features | ||
| Aspect Ratio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Background Removal | ✓ | — |
| Batch Generation | ✓ | — |
| Commercial Rights | ✓ | — |
| ControlNet | ✕ | ✓ |
| Export Formats | PNG, JPG (WEBP on web platform) | — |
| Image Animation | ✓ | ✕ |
| Image Reference | ✓ | ✓ |
| Image to Image | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inpainting | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRA Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Negative Prompts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Outpainting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Private Generations | ✓ | — |
| Prompt Customization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Style Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| Text to Image | ✓ | ✓ |
| Text to Video | ✓ | ✕ |
| Upscaling | ✓ | — |
| Video Style Transfer | — | ✕ |
| Video Upscaling | — | ✕ |
| Watermark | ✕ | — |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Canva Integration | ✕ | ✕ |
| Figma Plugin | ✕ | ✕ |
| Key Integrations | Discord (primary interface), Midjourney Web App, limited API for developers | Online A1111 WebUI, Online ComfyUI, Online Training pipeline |
| Photoshop Plugin | ✕ | ✕ |
Section 03
Midjourney vs Shakker: common questions
Is Midjourney or Shakker cheaper?
Midjourney's cheapest paid plan is $10/mo (Basic) and Shakker's is $12/mo - Basic. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Midjourney matchups
