Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · systematic review platforms · facts checked 14 Sept 2026

Covidence vs Sysrev

Covidence scores 6.8 to Sysrev's 5.1 among the systematic review platforms we rate, and is the better pick for 1 of the 5 kinds of buyer below.

Covidence
#2 of 4 systematic review platforms
6.8
/ 10
From
$339/year
Free plan
No
Sysrev
#4 of 4 systematic review platforms
5.1
/ 10
From
$50/mo
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Covidence wins, 6.8 to 5.1

Sysrev searches PubMed and OpenAlex directly inside the app; Covidence only imports references you already found elsewhere, through EndNote or Zotero, for instance. Covidence answers back with automatic reference deduplication, an auto-generated PRISMA flow diagram, and a risk of bias assessment built into every review, none of which Sysrev offers. Sysrev's cheapest paid plan is $50 a month per member and includes a documented API on its Premium and Enterprise tiers; Covidence costs $339 a year with unlimited collaborators included but no API at all.

Pick Covidence if you need automatic deduplication, PRISMA and risk of bias built in.

Pick Sysrev if you want to search PubMed and OpenAlex without importing first.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Finding papers fast
Sysrev
Covidence 0.0 · Sysrev 4.0 on finding papers
  • Searches a database of papers: Sysrev yes, Covidence no
Reading and pulling data from papers
Too close to call
Covidence 3.0 · Sysrev 3.0 on extraction and analysis
Systematic reviewers
Covidence
Covidence 10.0 · Sysrev 5.0 on running the review
  • Removes duplicate references: Covidence yes, Sysrev no
  • PRISMA flow diagram: Covidence yes, Sysrev no
  • Risk of bias assessment: Covidence yes, Sysrev no
Students on a budget
Too close to call
Covidence 5.5 · Sysrev 4.0 on pricing
Labs and libraries
Sysrev
Covidence 7.5 · Sysrev 8.1 on teams, access and privacy and citing and exports
  • API: Sysrev yes, Covidence no
  • But Covidence leads on works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others: EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, CRS against EndNote, Zotero
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other systematic review platforms we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Covidence leads on 3 of 6 criteria.

Running the review40% of the score
Covidence10.0
Sysrev5.0
Extraction and analysis15% of the score
Covidence3.0
Sysrev3.0
Teams, access and privacy15% of the score
Covidence7.5
Sysrev8.5
Pricing15% of the score
Covidence5.5
Sysrev4.0
Finding papers10% of the score
Covidence0.0
Sysrev4.0
Citing and exports5% of the score
Covidence7.5
Sysrev7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Removes duplicate references
Covidence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
PRISMA flow diagram
Covidence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Risk of bias assessment
Covidence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
API
Sysrev
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
Searches a database of papers
Sysrev
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
Works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others
Covidence
Covidence
EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, CRS
source ↗
Sysrev
EndNote, Zotero
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Does not train AI on your data
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Not published
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan (academic rate if offered)
Covidence
Does not apply
Sysrev
$50
source ↗
Yearly price, sold by the year only
Covidence
$339
source ↗
Sysrev
Does not apply
Export formats
Covidence
RIS, CSV, PubMedXML
source ↗
Sysrev
EndNote XML, Excel, Parquet
source ↗
Where they match (17)
Screening with include and exclude decisions
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
AI help with screening
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
Pulls data from many papers into a table
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
Answers show the passage they came from
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Ask questions of a paper
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Summarises papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Reads tables and figures
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Shared projects with your team
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
University or library licence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Sysrev
Yes
source ↗
Mobile app
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Works in languages other than English
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Answers a research question from the literature
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Map of connected papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Alerts for new papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Shows if later papers support or dispute a paper
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Browser extension
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Word or Google Docs add-in
Covidence
No
source ↗
Sysrev
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Covidence

Single
$339/yr
One review, unlimited collaborators, valid for 12 months
Package
$907/yr
Up to 3 reviews, unlimited collaborators, valid for 12 months
Organizations
Custom
Unlimited reviews, users, collaborators, and support with admin visibility and management tools

Sysrev

Free
Free
Unlimited public projects and reviewers, lifetime public storage
Basic
Free
Unlimited public projects, unlimited reviewers, free lifetime storage for public projects
Premium
$50/mo per member
Unlimited public and private projects, Sysrev Analytics, Auto Labeler, Group Labels, lifetime storage for public and private projects
Enterprise
Contact Us
Everything in Premium plus SSO, priority support, access provisioning, invoice billing, unique data sources, customized feature development, contracted expert reviewers

For everything else about each tool, read the full Covidence review and Sysrev review.

Section 04

Covidence vs Sysrev: common questions

Which is better, Covidence or Sysrev?

Covidence scores 6.8 and Sysrev 5.1 out of 10 among the systematic review platforms we rate. Covidence is ahead on running the review, pricing and citing and exports. Sysrev is ahead on teams, access and privacy and finding papers.

Is Covidence or Sysrev cheaper?

Covidence's cheapest paid plan is $339/year and Sysrev's is $50/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

What can Covidence do that Sysrev cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: removes duplicate references, pRISMA flow diagram and risk of bias assessment.

What can Sysrev do that Covidence cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: aPI and searches a database of papers.

Keep comparing