Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · systematic review platforms · facts checked 14 Sept 2026

Covidence vs Silvi

Covidence scores 6.8 to Silvi's 5.5 among the systematic review platforms we rate, and is the better pick for 2 of the 5 kinds of buyer below.

Covidence
#2 of 4 systematic review platforms
6.8
/ 10
From
$339/year
Free plan
No
Silvi
#3 of 4 systematic review platforms
5.5
/ 10
From
€40/mo (billed monthly; €19/mo billed annually)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Covidence wins, 6.8 to 5.5

Covidence costs $339 a year; Silvi's cheapest paid plan, Rapid, is 40 euros a month. Both only import references you already found elsewhere rather than searching a paper database themselves. Covidence includes AI assisted screening and unlimited collaborators from its cheapest plan, while Silvi holds AI screening back until Rapid and only adds team collaboration on the pricier Rapid Plus plan at 59 euros a month. Silvi does have a browser extension, which Covidence lacks.

Pick Covidence if you want AI screening and unlimited collaborators from the start.

Pick Silvi if you want a browser extension and don't need collaboration yet.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Finding papers fast
Too close to call
Covidence 0.0 · Silvi 0.0 on finding papers
Reading and pulling data from papers
Silvi
Covidence 3.0 · Silvi 5.0 on extraction and analysis
  • Answers show the passage they came from: Silvi yes, Covidence no
Systematic reviewers
Covidence
Covidence 10.0 · Silvi 8.0 on running the review
  • AI help with screening: Covidence yes, Silvi no
Students on a budget
Too close to call
Covidence 5.5 · Silvi 4.0 on pricing
Labs and libraries
Covidence
Covidence 7.5 · Silvi 4.9 on teams, access and privacy and citing and exports
  • University or library licence: Covidence yes, Silvi no
  • Works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others: EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, CRS against Zotero
  • Export formats: RIS, CSV, PubMedXML against CSV, Excel
  • But Silvi leads on browser extension: Silvi yes, Covidence no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other systematic review platforms we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Covidence leads on 4 of 6 criteria.

Running the review40% of the score
Covidence10.0
Silvi8.0
Extraction and analysis15% of the score
Covidence3.0
Silvi5.0
Teams, access and privacy15% of the score
Covidence7.5
Silvi4.5
Pricing15% of the score
Covidence5.5
Silvi4.0
Finding papers10% of the score
Covidence0.0
Silvi0.0
Citing and exports5% of the score
Covidence7.5
Silvi6.2
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

AI help with screening
Covidence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Answers show the passage they came from
Silvi
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
University or library licence
Covidence
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others
Covidence
Covidence
EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, CRS
source ↗
Silvi
Zotero
source ↗
Export formats
Covidence
Covidence
RIS, CSV, PubMedXML
source ↗
Silvi
CSV, Excel
source ↗
Browser extension
Silvi
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗

Published by only one of them

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan (academic rate if offered)
Covidence
Does not apply
Silvi
$43.2
source ↗
Yearly price, sold by the year only
Covidence
$339
source ↗
Silvi
Does not apply
Where they match (19)
Screening with include and exclude decisions
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
Removes duplicate references
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
PRISMA flow diagram
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
Risk of bias assessment
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
Pulls data from many papers into a table
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
Ask questions of a paper
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Summarises papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Reads tables and figures
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Shared projects with your team
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
API
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Mobile app
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Works in languages other than English
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Does not train AI on your data
Covidence
Yes
source ↗
Silvi
Yes
source ↗
Searches a database of papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Answers a research question from the literature
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Map of connected papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Alerts for new papers
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Shows if later papers support or dispute a paper
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Word or Google Docs add-in
Covidence
No
source ↗
Silvi
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Covidence

Single
$339/yr
One review, unlimited collaborators, valid for 12 months
Package
$907/yr
Up to 3 reviews, unlimited collaborators, valid for 12 months
Organizations
Custom
Unlimited reviews, users, collaborators, and support with admin visibility and management tools

Silvi

Free
Free
Unlimited reviews, manual screening and data extraction, no AI
Basic
Free
Unlimited reviews, easy screening, transparent data extraction; no credit card needed
Rapid
€40/mo · €228/yr
Bulk screening, AI for screening, AI for data extraction
Plus
€120/mo · €708/yr
PubMed integration, collaborative reviews, blinding of others' decisions
Enterprise
Custom
Large organizations; custom integrations, Single-Sign On, flexible invoicing

For everything else about each tool, read the full Covidence review and Silvi review.

Section 04

Covidence vs Silvi: common questions

Which is better, Covidence or Silvi?

Covidence scores 6.8 and Silvi 5.5 out of 10 among the systematic review platforms we rate. Covidence is ahead on running the review, teams, access and privacy, pricing and citing and exports. Silvi is ahead on extraction and analysis.

Is Covidence or Silvi cheaper?

Covidence's cheapest paid plan is $339/year and Silvi's is €40/mo (billed monthly; €19/mo billed annually). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

What can Covidence do that Silvi cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: aI help with screening and university or library licence.

What can Silvi do that Covidence cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: answers show the passage they came from and browser extension.

Keep comparing