Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · AI coding assistants · facts checked 19 Oct 2026

Cursor vs Devin

Cursor scores 8.2 to Devin's 7.7 among the AI coding assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 1 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Cursor
#2 of 15 AI coding assistants
8.2
/ 10
From
$8/mo (Plus)
Free plan
Yes
Devin
#3 of 15 AI coding assistants
7.7
/ 10
From
$20/mo (Pro plan)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Cursor wins, 8.2 to 7.7

Devin starts at $20 a month and Cursor's Premium at $30, and both run agents in the cloud that work on a repository without your machine. Cursor's cheaper $8 Plus plan has no cloud agents. Devin, the editor formerly sold as Windsurf, counts Pro use against a daily and weekly quota and then charges for credits. We could not find a SOC 2 report or a training policy on Devin's site; Cursor has SOC 2 and lets you switch training off.

Pick Cursor if you need a SOC 2 report and a stated training opt-out.

Pick Devin if you want DeepSeek among the models and an agent-first product.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Developers on large codebases
Too close to call
Cursor 10.0 · Devin 10.0 on agents and your codebase
Developers paying their own way
Devin
Cursor 7.8 · Devin 8.9 on pricing
  • Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $20 against $30
Teams that pick their own models
Cursor
Cursor 8.0 · Devin 5.0 on model freedom
  • Bring your own API key: Cursor yes, Devin no
Companies strict about code privacy
Too close to call
Cursor 7.3 · Devin 7.0 on privacy and security and where it works
  • Does not train AI on your code: Cursor Unless you opt out, Devin not published
  • Legal cover for generated code: Cursor no, Devin not published
  • Editors and terminals it works in: Cursor Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor, Devin Cli, vscode, jetbrains, own editor
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other AI coding assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Cursor leads on 2 of 5 criteria.

Agents and your codebase25% of the score
Cursor10.0
Devin10.0
Pricing20% of the score
Cursor7.8
Devin8.9
Model freedom20% of the score
Cursor8.0
Devin5.0
Privacy and security20% of the score
Cursor7.5
Devin7.0
Where it works15% of the score
Cursor7.0
Devin7.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Devin
Cursor
$30
source ↗
Devin
$20
source ↗
Bring your own API key
Cursor
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

AI model families you can choose
Cursor
Claude, gpt, gemini, grok, own
source ↗
Devin
Claude, gpt, gemini, deepseek, own
source ↗
Does not train AI on your code
Cursor
Unless you opt out
source ↗
Devin
Not published
SOC 2
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Not published
Legal cover for generated code
Cursor
No
source ↗
Devin
Not published
Editors and terminals it works in
Cursor
Cli, jetbrains, xcode, own editor
source ↗
Devin
Cli, vscode, jetbrains, own editor
source ↗
Where they match (9)
Agents that work in the cloud and open pull requests
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Understands your whole codebase
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Reviews pull requests
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Suggests code as you type
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Runs models on your own machine
Cursor
No
source ↗
Devin
No
source ↗
Option to keep no copy of your code
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Runs on your own servers or cloud
Cursor
Yes
source ↗
Devin
Yes
source ↗
Open source
Cursor
No
source ↗
Devin
No
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Cursor

Free
Free
Limited agent and Chat requests, Cursor's own models only
Plus
$8/mo · $80/yr
Base weekly usage pool shared with Grok, Grok models only (no Claude, GPT or Gemini), no cloud agents or Bugbot; includes Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine, Build and X Premium perks
Premium
$30/mo · $300/yr
4x Plus usage, latest Grok models, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot code reviews, Claude, GPT and Gemini at API list price billed separately
Super
$100/mo · $1,000/yr
15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
Ultra
$200/mo · $2,000/yr
50x Plus usage, earliest access to new products and models
Teams
$30/mo/user
Premium, Super or Ultra seats at $30, $100 or $200, mix and match; centralized billing, usage analytics, team privacy settings, SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom
Pooled usage across the team, invoice billing, SCIM, granular spend controls, audit logs, priority support

Devin

Free
Free
Light quota for coding with agents, limited model availability, unlimited inline edits and Tab completions
Pro
$20/mo
Increased quotas, full model availability, frontier model access (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini), Devin Cloud access
Max
$200/mo
Everything in Pro plus significantly higher usage quotas for power users
Teams
$80/mo team + $40/mo per full dev seat
Everything in Pro plus unlimited team members, collaboration, centralized billing, admin dashboard, priority support
Enterprise
Custom
Everything in Teams plus dedicated account management, SAML/OIDC SSO, VPC deployment, enterprise admin controls

For everything else about each tool, read the full Cursor review and Devin review.

Section 04

Cursor vs Devin: common questions

Which is better, Cursor or Devin?

Cursor scores 8.2 and Devin 7.7 out of 10 among the AI coding assistants we rate. Cursor is ahead on model freedom and privacy and security. Devin is ahead on pricing.

Is Cursor or Devin cheaper?

Cursor's cheapest paid plan is $8/mo (Plus) and Devin's is $20/mo (Pro plan). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

Do Cursor and Devin have a free plan?

Yes, both do.

What can Cursor do that Devin cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: bring your own API key.

Keep comparing