Head-to-head · facts checked 13 Sept 2026
Bardeen vs Lutra AI
Bardeen uniquely has 10 features · Lutra AI uniquely has 10 features.
From
$29/mo
Free plan
Yes
The verdict
Bardeen or Lutra AI?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Bardeen
Free
Free
100 credits/month always free; build your own scrapers, basic access
Basic
$10/mo
100 credits/month included; build your own scrapers, premium scrapers, enrichment, teams
Premium
$50/mo · $480/yr
1000 credits/month included or 12,000 credits per year; build your own scrapers, premium scrapers, enrichment, teams
Enterprise
Custom
Custom bulk credits, custom-built and maintained scrapers, premium support
Lutra AI
Free
Free
15 messages/day, 200 credits/month, basic tools only
Essentials
— · $23/mo billed yearly
Unlimited messages, 2,000 credits/month, premium tools, scheduling & webhooks
Professional
— · $63/mo billed yearly
Unlimited messages, 6,000 credits/month, bulk credit purchases, priority support
Enterprise
Custom
Unlimited credits, custom integrations, dedicated support, custom security & analytics
Bulk Credits 10K
$100 one-time
10,000 credits at 1.0¢/credit for Professional/Enterprise plans
Bulk Credits 50K
$450 one-time
50,000 credits at 0.9¢/credit for Professional/Enterprise plans
Bulk Credits 100K
$800 one-time
100,000 credits at 0.8¢/credit for Professional/Enterprise plans
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Bardeen
Pros
- No-code visual scraper builder makes it accessible to non-technical users like sales reps and solopreneurs.
- AI qualification layer filters leads against your ideal customer profile before you ever review them.
- Built-in email validation is included in the enrichment process, reducing bounce rates.
- Over 200,000 people have signed up.
- Supports scheduled runs, event-based triggers, and manual kicks for flexible workflow execution.
- Integrates with 50+ tools including Google Sheets, Airtable, Salesforce, and Notion.
- Human review of leads before export is optional rather than forced, giving users workflow control.
- Premade premium scrapers in a template library reduce setup time for common use cases.
Cons
- The platform is English-first, which limits usability for international teams without prior investigation.
- Pricing positions itself as cheaper than Clay, but the cost structure may still be a barrier for very small teams.
- As a Chrome extension-based tool, it may face limitations or disruptions from browser policy changes.
- No clear indication of enterprise-grade support or SLAs for teams with higher reliability requirements.
Lutra AI
Pros
- Lutra generates and executes real code on the fly, allowing connections to virtually any API rather than being limited to pre-built connectors.
- Plain English workflow creation means no drag-and-drop canvas or node diagrams are required, lowering the technical barrier significantly.
- Finished workflows called Playbooks can be run once, scheduled, or shared with teammates for collaborative use.
- A pre-built Playbook library offers practical starting points like LinkedIn profile enrichment, company news research, and YouTube data piped into Google Sheets.
- The platform handles conditional logic and data transformation internally, so users don't need to manually architect workflow branches.
- The conversational interface is backed by actual code execution, making it more powerful than tools that only offer a chat-style UI without real automation depth.
- Webhook-based, scheduled, and manual triggers are supported, covering the majority of common automation use cases.
Cons
- Error handling is not publicly documented, which is a serious concern for anyone running mission-critical scheduled workflows.
- There are no publicly mentioned execution logs, removing visibility into what happened when a workflow runs or fails.
- The feature surface is narrower than established competitors like Make, and the platform lacks a visual flow builder for users who prefer one.
- As a 2023 launch with limited community evidence, the product carries significant maturity and reliability uncertainty.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| AI model | Proprietary (multi-model, integrates leading AI and web search providers) | Proprietary (multi-model orchestration) |
| User base | 200K+ | — |
| Platforms | Web, Chrome Extension | Web |
| Languages | English primarily | English only |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Credit-based | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No — free tier available permanently | No — free tier available indefinitely |
| Starting price | $10/mo | $29/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
| All plans | Free — Free Basic — $10/mo Premium — $50/mo Enterprise — Custom | Free — Free Essentials Professional Enterprise — Custom Bulk Credits 10K — $100 one-time Bulk Credits 50K — $450 one-time Bulk Credits 100K — $800 one-time |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Sales teams, solopreneurs, and recruiters who need AI-powered lead sourcing, web scraping, and contact enrichment | Individuals and companies wanting AI-driven automation of business operations |
| Differentiator | Bardeen combines agentic web scraping, AI-powered lead qualification, and contact enrichment in a single credit-based platform positioned as an affordable alternative to Clay for solopreneurs and small sales teams. | Lutra uses an AI agent that writes and executes automation code on the fly via natural language, eliminating the need for manual flow builders or coding while connecting to virtually any API or MCP-compatible service. |
| Competitors | Clay, Apollo.io, PhantomBuster, Browse AI, Apify | Zapier, Make (Integromat), n8n, Relay.app, Bardeen |
| Features | ||
| Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Build Your Own Scrapers | ✓ | — |
| Bulk Credits Purchase | — | ✓ |
| Custom Integrations | — | ✓ |
| Custom Bulk Credits | ✓ | — |
| Enrichment | ✓ | — |
| Premium Support (Enterprise) | ✓ | — |
| Premium Tools (Outlook, Onedrive, Hubspot) | — | ✓ |
| Premium Scrapers | ✓ | — |
| Priority Support | — | ✓ |
| Scheduling and Webhooks | — | ✓ |
| Teams | ✓ | — |
| AI Agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Webhooks | ✕ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Code | — | ✓ |
| Data Transform | ✓ | ✓ |
| Error Handling | ✓ | — |
| Human in Loop | ✓ | ✕ |
| Num Integrations | 50+ | 30+ named integrations plus custom API/MCP/OpenAPI connectors |
| Scheduled Runs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trigger Types | schedule / manual / event-based (via automation triggers) | webhook / schedule / manual message |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✕ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✕ | ✓ |
| Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | Google Sheets, Airtable, Notion, Salesforce, LinkedIn | HubSpot, Google Sheets, Slack, Outlook, Apollo |
| Openai Integration | ✓ | — |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhook Support | ✕ | ✓ |
Section 03
Bardeen vs Lutra AI: common questions
Is Bardeen or Lutra AI cheaper?
Bardeen's cheapest paid plan is $10/mo and Lutra AI's is $29/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Bardeen matchups
