ProWritingAid vs Wordtune
Wordtune scores 5.8 to ProWritingAid's 3.9 among the AI writing assistants we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.
Wordtune wins, 5.8 to 3.9
Wordtune's Advanced plan is $13.99 a month, under half of ProWritingAid Premium's $30. Wordtune writes new text from a prompt; ProWritingAid only rewrites and checks text you already have, with no blank-page generation found. ProWritingAid checks for plagiarism through separate credits, a feature not present in Wordtune's known facts. ProWritingAid says it does not train its AI on your writing at all, while Wordtune lets users opt out but defaults training on.
Pick ProWritingAid if you want plagiarism checking without opt-out AI training.
Pick Wordtune if you want cheaper text generation and don't need plagiarism checks.
Best for
Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.
- Writes new text from a prompt: Wordtune yes, ProWritingAid no
- Phone keyboard that checks as you type: Wordtune yes, ProWritingAid no
- Word, Google Docs, Outlook, Gmail and Slack add-ins: Google_docs, outlook, gmail, slack against Word, google_docs
- But ProWritingAid leads on checks for plagiarism: ProWritingAid yes, Wordtune no
- Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $13.99 against $30
- Team plan with shared settings: Wordtune yes, ProWritingAid no
- Single sign-on: Wordtune yes, ProWritingAid no
- Does not train AI on your writing: Yes against unless you opt out
How they score
Both are scored the same way, against the other AI writing assistants we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Wordtune leads on 3 of 5 criteria.
Where they differ
Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.
Published by only one of them
Where they match (9)
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
ProWritingAid
Wordtune
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
ProWritingAid
- Offers 25+ writing reports including pacing analysis, dialogue tag tracking, and repeated phrase detection that go far beyond surface-level grammar checks.
- Integrates with Scrivener, a major differentiator over Grammarly that fiction writers in long-form workflows genuinely value.
- Works across multiple environments including a web editor, desktop app, Chrome extension, Microsoft Word, and Google Docs.
- The Chapter Critique feature provides AI-driven feedback on entire chapters at once, approximating developmental editing rather than simple grammar correction.
- The Virtual Beta Reader simulates reader response feedback on manuscripts, offering fiction writers access to a resource they may not otherwise have.
- Sparks feature helps writers push through creative blocks by offering AI-powered inspiration and continuation mid-chapter.
- In development since 2012, giving it a long track record in writing software.
- Manuscript-level depth of analysis is available at a comparable price point to competitors that offer far less specialized feedback.
- Runs on a proprietary AI model with no recognizable third-party AI partnership, which may raise questions about model quality and transparency.
- The tool is heavily specialized for long-form fiction writers, making it potentially overkill or poorly suited for casual or business writers.
- The large number of reports (25+) can feel overwhelming and may require significant time investment to use effectively.
- Does not offer GPT-4 or similarly branded AI integrations that some competing tools use to establish credibility.
- Users coming from Grammarly may face a learning curve given the depth and complexity of ProWritingAid's feature set.
Wordtune
- Built on proprietary AI models from AI21 Labs, not a generic GPT wrapper, giving it a distinct output style.
- Fact-verified AI suggestions claim to cross-check generated content against five or more sources before surfacing.
- Rewriting and paraphrasing tools offer tone and length adjustments in a fast, focused loop most users rely on daily.
- Available across web, Chrome extension, iOS, Android, and Google Docs for broad accessibility.
- Long-form writing mode supports essay structure and includes source citations for generated facts.
- No WordPress integration, limiting utility for content publishers who work directly in CMS environments.
- No publicly confirmed API access, making it difficult to embed into custom workflows or developer tooling.
- Grammar and style analysis is less deep than Grammarly, so it may not satisfy users with advanced proofreading needs.
- Fact-verification claims are difficult to independently validate and should be treated with caution in practice.
- Not designed for long-form content generation, making it a poor fit for users seeking a Jasper-style content engine.
- Focused feature set means users needing an all-in-one AI writing platform will likely need additional tools.
ProWritingAid vs Wordtune: common questions
Which is better, ProWritingAid or Wordtune?
Wordtune scores 5.8 and ProWritingAid 3.9 out of 10 among the AI writing assistants we rate. Wordtune is ahead on pricing, where it works and teams and control. ProWritingAid is ahead on privacy and security.
Is ProWritingAid or Wordtune cheaper?
ProWritingAid's cheapest paid plan is $10.00/mo (Premium, billed yearly at $120/yr) and Wordtune's is Free ($0). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
What can ProWritingAid do that Wordtune cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: checks for plagiarism.
What can Wordtune do that ProWritingAid cannot?
On the facts both vendors publish: writes new text from a prompt, phone keyboard that checks as you type, team plan with shared settings and single sign-on.
