Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · literature search tools · facts checked 14 Sept 2026

Consensus vs Undermind

Consensus scores 6.7 to Undermind's 5.4 among the literature search tools we rate, and is the better pick for 1 of the 5 kinds of buyer below.

Consensus
#5 of 13 literature search tools
6.7
/ 10
From
$20/mo
Free plan
Yes
Undermind
#9 of 13 literature search tools
5.4
/ 10
From
$20/mo academic plan ($75/mo industry plan)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict

Consensus wins, 6.7 to 5.4

Undermind and Consensus both cost $20 a month for their cheapest paid plan. Undermind answers back with reading of figures and tables inside papers, which Consensus does not offer, and it includes shared team projects on its free plan. Consensus counters with a visual map of connected papers and a metered API included on that same $20 plan, where Undermind's API is reserved for a separately priced Enterprise tier.

Pick Consensus if you want a paper map and API access on the entry plan.

Pick Undermind if you want figure reading and free team sharing.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Finding papers fast
Too close to call
Consensus 7.0 · Undermind 7.0 on finding papers
  • Map of connected papers: Consensus yes, Undermind no
  • Alerts for new papers: Undermind yes, Consensus no
Reading and pulling data from papers
Too close to call
Consensus 8.5 · Undermind 8.5 on reading and analysing papers
  • Summarises papers: Consensus yes, Undermind no
  • Reads tables and figures: Undermind yes, Consensus no
Systematic reviewers
Too close to call
Consensus 0.0 · Undermind 0.0 on systematic reviews
Students on a budget
Too close to call
Consensus 7.0 · Undermind 7.0 on pricing
Labs and libraries
Consensus
Consensus 6.9 · Undermind 2.0 on citing and writing and access, teams and privacy
  • Works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others: Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, Paperpile against None
  • University or library licence: Consensus yes, Undermind no
  • Works in languages other than English: Consensus yes, Undermind no
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other literature search tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Consensus leads on 2 of 6 criteria.

Finding papers20% of the score
Consensus7.0
Undermind7.0
Reading and analysing papers25% of the score
Consensus8.5
Undermind8.5
Systematic reviews10% of the score
Consensus0.0
Undermind0.0
Pricing20% of the score
Consensus7.0
Undermind7.0
Citing and writing15% of the score
Consensus5.5
Undermind0.0
Access, teams and privacy10% of the score
Consensus9.0
Undermind5.0
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Map of connected papers
Consensus
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Alerts for new papers
Undermind
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Summarises papers
Consensus
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Reads tables and figures
Undermind
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Works with Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and others
Consensus
Consensus
Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, Paperpile
source ↗
Undermind
None
source ↗
Export formats
Consensus
Consensus
CSV, RIS
source ↗
Undermind
None
source ↗
University or library licence
Consensus
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Works in languages other than English
Consensus
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Where they match (20)
Searches a database of papers
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Answers a research question from the literature
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Shows if later papers support or dispute a paper
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Ask questions of a paper
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Pulls data from many papers into a table
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Answers show the passage they came from
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Writes a literature review for you
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Screening with include and exclude decisions
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
AI help with screening
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Removes duplicate references
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
PRISMA flow diagram
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Risk of bias assessment
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan (academic rate if offered)
Consensus
$20
source ↗
Undermind
$20
source ↗
Helps you write and adds citations
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Browser extension
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Word or Google Docs add-in
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Shared projects with your team
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
API
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Mobile app
Consensus
No
source ↗
Undermind
No
source ↗
Does not train AI on your data
Consensus
Yes
source ↗
Undermind
Yes
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Consensus

Free
Free
Unlimited basic searches, 10 Pro messages, 3 Deep reviews
Pro
$20/mo · $144/yr
Unlimited Pro messages, 15 Deep reviews per month, unlimited access to every research tool
Deep
$65/mo · $540/yr
200 Deep reviews per month, unlimited Pro messages, unlimited access to every research tool
Teams
$30/seat/mo · $240/seat/yr
Up to 200 seats, 50 Deep reviews per month, centralized billing, manage accounts
Enterprise
Custom
Everything in Team plus greater volume discounts, research library integration, manage thousands of users, dedicated support

Undermind

Free
Free
Strong AI models, deep searches, reports, shared projects, standard rate limits
Pro (Academic)
$20/mo · $192/yr
Latest AI models, deepest full-text analysis, 10x higher usage limits, unlimited projects/files/paper libraries
Pro (Industry)
$75/mo · $720/yr
Team (Academic)
— · $180/person/yr
5-seat minimum, all Pro features plus team management, priority support, centralized billing
Team (Industry)
$75/mo · $720/person/yr
Enterprise
Custom
All Team features plus increased compute, sitewide login, onboarding seminars, admin dashboard, custom SLA/security

For everything else about each tool, read the full Consensus review and Undermind review.

Section 04

Consensus vs Undermind: common questions

Which is better, Consensus or Undermind?

Consensus scores 6.7 and Undermind 5.4 out of 10 among the literature search tools we rate. Consensus is ahead on citing and writing and access, teams and privacy.

Is Consensus or Undermind cheaper?

Consensus's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo and Undermind's is $20/mo academic plan ($75/mo industry plan). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

What can Consensus do that Undermind cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: map of connected papers, summarises papers, university or library licence and works in languages other than English.

What can Undermind do that Consensus cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: alerts for new papers and reads tables and figures.

Keep comparing