Every score is worked out from the vendor's own pages · How we score →Disclosure
SAASINSPECTOR
Head-to-head · X and LinkedIn growth tools · facts checked 26 Sept 2026

Postwise vs Tweet Hunter

Tweet Hunter scores 6.0 to Postwise's 5.3 among the X and LinkedIn growth tools we rate, and is the better pick for 3 of the 4 kinds of buyer below.

Postwise
#5 of 6 X and LinkedIn growth tools
5.3
/ 10
From
$37/mo (Basic)
Free plan
No — free 7-day trial only
Tweet Hunter
#3 of 6 X and LinkedIn growth tools
6.0
/ 10
From
$29/mo
Free plan
No
The verdict

Tweet Hunter wins, 6.0 to 5.3

Tweet Hunter's cheapest plan is $29 a month against Postwise's $37, and it adds three engagement tools Postwise lacks: automatic DMs, suggested people and posts to reply to, and a running list of who engaged. Postwise answers back on reach: it publishes to X, LinkedIn and Threads and can post to more than one at once, while Tweet Hunter only publishes to X. Tweet Hunter also follows GDPR, which Postwise's privacy policy does not state.

Pick Postwise if you post to LinkedIn and Threads too, not just X.

Pick Tweet Hunter if you want automatic DMs, reply suggestions or a list of who engaged.

Best for

Who each one suits, decided on the criteria that matter to that buyer and the checked facts where the two differ.

Creators growing an audience
Tweet Hunter
Postwise 5.0 · Tweet Hunter 7.7 on growing an audience and writing and repurposing
  • Sends DMs automatically: Tweet Hunter yes, Postwise no
  • Suggests posts and people to reply to: Tweet Hunter yes, Postwise no
  • Keeps a list of the people who engaged: Tweet Hunter yes, Postwise no
  • But Postwise leads on posts to more than one network at once: Postwise yes, Tweet Hunter no
Creators on a budget
Tweet Hunter
Postwise 5.0 · Tweet Hunter 6.0 on pricing
  • Monthly price, cheapest paid plan: $29 against $37
Posting to several networks
Postwise
Postwise 7.0 · Tweet Hunter 3.0 on where it posts
  • Networks it publishes to: X, linkedin, threads against X
Teams and ghostwriters
Tweet Hunter
Postwise 4.0 · Tweet Hunter 4.5 on analytics and teams
  • GDPR: Tweet Hunter yes, Postwise does not say
Section 01

How they score

Both are scored the same way, against the other X and LinkedIn growth tools we rate, from facts on each vendor's own pages. Tweet Hunter leads on 3 of 5 criteria.

Growing an audience30% of the score
Postwise5.0
Tweet Hunter10.0
Pricing25% of the score
Postwise5.0
Tweet Hunter6.0
Where it posts20% of the score
Postwise7.0
Tweet Hunter3.0
Writing and repurposing15% of the score
Postwise5.0
Tweet Hunter3.0
Analytics and teams10% of the score
Postwise4.0
Tweet Hunter4.5
How the score works →
Section 02

Where they differ

Every point where the two vendors' published facts disagree, with a link to where each fact was read. "Not published" means the vendor does not say either way.

Sends DMs automatically
Tweet Hunter
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Suggests posts and people to reply to
Tweet Hunter
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Keeps a list of the people who engaged
Tweet Hunter
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Monthly price, cheapest paid plan
Tweet Hunter
Postwise
$37
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
$29
source ↗
Networks it publishes to
Postwise
Postwise
X, linkedin, threads
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
X
source ↗
Posts to more than one network at once
Postwise
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗

Published by only one of them

GDPR
Postwise
Not published
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Where they match (12)
Adds a plug once a post takes off
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Reposts your best posts automatically
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Library of high-performing posts
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Free plan
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗
Free trial
Postwise
7 days
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
7 days
source ↗
Writes in your voice
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Turns videos, articles or links into posts
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗
Generates images for posts
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗
Post and account analytics
Postwise
Yes
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Yes
source ↗
Several people on one account
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗
API
Postwise
No
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
No
source ↗
Ways to reach support
Postwise
Email, live_chat
source ↗
Tweet Hunter
Email, live_chat
source ↗
Section 03

Pricing, plan by plan

Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.

Postwise

Basic
$37/mo
400 AI Credits, 6 Months Scheduling, Connect 5 Accounts, all Growth Tools
Unlimited
$97/mo
Unlimited AI Credits, Unlimited Scheduling, Unlimited Accounts, everything in Basic

Tweet Hunter

Discover
$29/mo · $276/yr
1 X account, 12M+ viral tweets library, scheduling, evergreen tweets, 3,000 Auto-DMs/month, full analytics
Grow
$49/mo · $432/yr
5 X accounts, everything in Discover plus AI writer, X CRM, 7,500 Auto-DMs/month, paid partnership label
Enterprise
$200/mo · $2,004/yr
Unlimited X accounts, everything in Grow, 15,000 Auto-DMs/month, ghostwriting mode, custom trained AI, unlimited AI use, priority support

For everything else about each tool, read the full Postwise review and Tweet Hunter review.

Section 04

Postwise vs Tweet Hunter: common questions

Which is better, Postwise or Tweet Hunter?

Tweet Hunter scores 6.0 and Postwise 5.3 out of 10 among the X and LinkedIn growth tools we rate. Tweet Hunter is ahead on growing an audience, pricing and analytics and teams. Postwise is ahead on where it posts and writing and repurposing.

Is Postwise or Tweet Hunter cheaper?

Postwise's cheapest paid plan is $37/mo (Basic) and Tweet Hunter's is $29/mo. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.

Do Postwise and Tweet Hunter have a free plan?

Neither has a free plan.

What can Postwise do that Tweet Hunter cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: posts to more than one network at once.

What can Tweet Hunter do that Postwise cannot?

On the facts both vendors publish: sends DMs automatically, suggests posts and people to reply to and keeps a list of the people who engaged.

Keep comparing