Head-to-head · facts checked 14 Sept 2026
Greptile vs Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph uniquely has 5 features · Greptile uniquely has 1 feature.
From
Free (Starter)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict
Greptile or Sourcegraph?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Greptile
Starter
Free
1 active developer, unlimited repos, 50 credits/month (1 credit = 1 standard review)
Pro
$30/seat/mo · Custom pricing available for annual contracts
Unlimited repos, 50 credits/seat, $1 per additional credit, unlimited users, custom rules, unlimited external app connections
Enterprise
Custom pricing · Custom
Self-hosted option, SSO/SAML, GitHub Enterprise, dedicated Slack support, custom DPA and invoicing
Sourcegraph
Enterprise
Not publicly stated · Starting at $16,000/yr
Includes credits for AI features, scales with team size; full platform access including Deep Search, Batch Changes, Insights, Monitoring, MCP Server, API, CLI, single-tenant cloud, enterprise security, 24×5 support
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Greptile
Pros
- Indexes the entire codebase into a graph structure covering files, functions, and dependencies, not just the diff being reviewed.
- Catches breaking changes in files three or more layers removed from the PR, which most diff-only tools miss.
- Inline comments come with click-to-apply suggestions, reducing friction for developers acting on feedback.
- PR summaries include natural language explanations and optional Mermaid diagrams of affected logic.
- Custom coding standards can be written in plain English, with no proprietary rule DSL to learn.
- The TREX agent writes and runs tests for each PR inside a sandboxed environment, adding automated test generation to the workflow.
- v4 release explicitly targeted false positive reduction, showing iterative improvement based on real user pain points.
- Security scanning for overflow vulnerabilities and undefined method calls is built into the review pass without requiring a separate tool.
Cons
- Earlier versions had a significant false positive noise problem, which required a dedicated v4 release to address.
- Greptile does not do code completion or code generation, limiting its usefulness to review workflows only.
- The TREX test generation feature is too new to have a reliable track record in production environments.
- Security scanning is not a dedicated SAST tool, so teams with serious security requirements may still need a separate solution.
- The breadth of features — review, refactoring suggestions, security, test generation — risks jack-of-all-trades quality trade-offs.
- No independent third-party validation of the full-codebase awareness claim against real-world codebases at scale.
Sourcegraph
Pros
- SCIP-powered codebase indexing builds a deterministic map of definitions, references, and cross-repository relationships that few competitors match.
- Indexes across every code host an organization uses, allowing AI agents and developers to query the entire codebase simultaneously rather than a single open file.
- MCP Server integration enables external agents like Claude Code and Cursor to tap directly into Sourcegraph's index, a genuinely flexible architectural approach.
- The enterprise product suite is comprehensive, covering Code Search, Deep Search, Code Insights, Agentic Batch Changes, and Code Monitoring in one platform.
- The 2025 pivot away from consumer AI tiers toward enterprise code intelligence positions it in a more defensible, specialized market segment.
- The underlying codebase indexing technology is described as technically sound and cross-verified against official documentation.
- Designed specifically for organizations with sprawling, multi-repository codebases where single-repo tools fall short.
Cons
- Minimum annual cost of $16,000 makes it inaccessible for small teams, individual developers, or startups.
- Cody Free and Pro tiers were discontinued in July 2025, eliminating any affordable entry point for non-enterprise users.
- The consumer-facing AI assistant path was shut down entirely, reducing product flexibility for teams that don't fit the enterprise mold.
- Whether the superior indexing context actually translates to better AI outputs in practice depends heavily on individual team setup.
- The product has shifted significantly in scope and positioning, meaning early adopters or those familiar with older Sourcegraph may face a steep re-evaluation curve.
- As a platform that sits above repositories rather than inside an IDE, it requires organizational buy-in and infrastructure integration to deliver value.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| AI model | Proprietary (multi-LLM swarm agents) | Multiple (Claude, GPT-4, and others via MCP) |
| User base | 9,000+ teams | 200+ enterprise engineering teams |
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, GitLab, IDE integrations, MCP, API | Web, CLI, IDE extensions, MCP Server |
| Languages | Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Elixir, Java, C, C++, C#, Swift, PHP, Rust, and most others | All major coding languages (25+) |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes — 14-day free trial | — |
| Starting price | Free (Starter) | $16K/yr (Enterprise) |
| Enterprise | Custom | Starting at $16,000/yr |
| All plans | Starter — Free Pro — $30/seat/mo Enterprise — Custom pricing | Enterprise — Not publicly stated |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Engineering teams and individual developers who want AI-powered pull request code review with deep codebase context | Enterprise engineering teams managing large, complex, multi-repository codebases |
| Differentiator | Greptile builds a graph index of your entire codebase and uses a swarm of parallel agents to review PRs with full cross-file context, catching complex multi-file logical bugs that human reviewers and simpler diff-only tools miss. | Provides complete, SCIP-powered codebase indexing across thousands of repositories to give AI agents and humans exhaustive, deterministic context for accurate large-scale code changes — beyond what any single-repo or partial-context tool can offer |
| Competitors | CodeRabbit, BugBot, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Sourcegraph | GitHub Copilot, Cursor, JetBrains AI, Tabnine, Codeium |
| Features | ||
| Cli Support | — | ✓ |
| Code Completion | ✕ | ✓ |
| Code Generation | ✕ | ✓ |
| Code Review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codebase Indexing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debugging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Git Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| IDE Plugins | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Language Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Refactoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Security Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self Hosted Option | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test Generation | ✓ | — |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Github Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gitlab Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Jetbrains Plugin | — | ✓ |
| Key Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, Greptile MCP, Zapier, SSO/SAML (Enterprise) | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, PagerDuty, Email, Jira, Webhook, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Amp, MCP Server |
| Vscode Extension | — | ✓ |
Section 03
Greptile vs Sourcegraph: common questions
Is Greptile or Sourcegraph cheaper?
Greptile's cheapest paid plan is Free (Starter) and Sourcegraph's is $16K/yr (Enterprise). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Greptile matchups
