Head-to-head · facts checked 14 Sept 2026
Elicit vs Hebbia
Elicit uniquely has 16 features · Hebbia uniquely has 7 features.
From
$19/mo academic plan ($75/mo industry plan)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict
Elicit or Hebbia?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Elicit
Free
Free
Limited Research Agent and Research Reports
Basic
Free
Limited usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
Plus (Academic)
$19/mo · $132/yr
Standard usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
Pro (Academic and Industry)
$69/mo · $480/yr
5x usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
Scale (Academic and Industry)
$149/mo · $1,068/yr
9x usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
Enterprise (Academic and Industry)
Custom
Custom usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
Hebbia
Hebbia does not publish a plan list we could read.
For everything else about each tool, read the full Elicit review and Hebbia review.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | New York, NY |
| AI model | Claude (Anthropic) + proprietary models | GPT-4 and proprietary retrieval architecture |
| User base | 5M+ | $30T AUM of firms using Hebbia |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Languages | English primarily | English primarily |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Custom |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Starting price | $19/mo academic plan ($75/mo industry plan) | — |
| Enterprise | Custom | Yes |
| All plans | Free — Free Basic — Free Plus (Academic) — $19/mo Pro (Academic and Industry) — $69/mo Scale (Academic and Industry) — $149/mo Enterprise (Academic and Industry) — Custom | — |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Systematic literature reviews and academic research | Enterprise knowledge workers in finance, law, and consulting needing AI-powered document analysis at scale |
| Differentiator | Dedicated Systematic Review Workflow screening up to 5,000 papers; nonprofit mission focused on scaling good reasoning and trustworthy AI-assisted research | Matrix interface that runs multi-document, multi-step AI analysis across thousands of documents simultaneously, surfacing cited answers from uploaded files and integrated financial data sources |
| Competitors | Consensus, Semantic Scholar, Research Rabbit, Scite, Perplexity, SciSpace | Glean, Luminance, Harvey, Relativity, Kira Systems |
| Features | ||
| 138m+ Paper Search | ✓ | — |
| Cited AI Answers | — | ✓ |
| Export to Ris/Csv/Bib/PDF/Docx | ✓ | — |
| Extract From Figures in Papers | ✓ | — |
| Multi Document Matrix Analysis | — | ✓ |
| PDF and Document Ingestion | — | ✓ |
| Pitchbook Integration | — | ✓ |
| Real Time Collaboration | ✓ | — |
| S&P Capital Iq Integration | — | ✓ |
| Sec Filings Integration | — | ✓ |
| Systematic Review Workflow | ✓ | — |
| Unlimited Paper Alerts | ✓ | — |
| Academic Search | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI Summarization | ✓ | ✓ |
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✕ |
| Citation Generation | ✓ | — |
| Data Privacy | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document Upload | ✓ | ✓ |
| Export Formats | ✓ | — |
| Fact Checking | ✓ | — |
| Follow Up Questions | ✓ | — |
| Mobile App | ✕ | ✕ |
| Multi Source Synthesis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web Search | ✕ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✕ |
| Google Docs Export | — | ✕ |
| Key Integrations | Zotero import, Elicit API, MCP server for agent/workflow integration, custom data sources (Enterprise) | SEC Filings, Earnings Transcripts, European Filings, UK Companies House, Australia and NZ Filings, FactSet, S&P Capital IQ, PitchBook, Preqin, Fitch, ICE Market Data, EMMA, SharePoint, OneDrive, Box, Dropbox, Egnyte, AWS, IntraLinks, Web, Podcasts, Third Bridge, Guidepoint, Salesforce, DealCloud, Snowflake, Databricks |
| Notion Integration | — | ✕ |
| Zotero Integration | ✓ | ✕ |
Keep comparing
More Elicit matchups
