SAASINSPECTOR

Consensus vs Silvi

Consensus uniquely has 11 features · Silvi uniquely has 8 features.

ConsensusSilvi
Company
Founded2021
HQSan Francisco, USACopenhagen, Denmark
AI modelProprietary (GPT-4 based)Proprietary
User base10M+
PlatformsWeb, Chrome ExtensionWeb
LanguagesEnglish primarilyEnglish primarily
Pricing
Pricing modelFreemium
Free planYesYes
Free trialNoNo — free plan available indefinitely
Starting price$20/mo€19/mo
EnterpriseCustom pricingCustom, billed annually
All plansPro$20/moDeep$65/moTeams$30/seat/moEnterpriseCustomBasicFreeRapid€40/moPlus€120/moEnterpriseCustom
Positioning
Best forResearchers, clinicians, students, and faculty conducting literature reviewsResearchers, academics, and scientific teams conducting systematic literature reviews
DifferentiatorAI-powered search and analysis of 250M+ peer-reviewed papers with cited AI responses and Deep Literature ReviewsSilvi combines transparent PDF-based data extraction with direct highlighting, AI-assisted screening and coding, and built-in collaboration tools specifically designed for systematic literature reviews with scientific rigor.
CompetitorsElicit, Semantic Scholar, Perplexity AI, Research Rabbit, Scite.aiCovidence, Rayyan, Rayyan AI, Distiller SR
Features
AI Data Extraction
AI Screening
Blinding of Decisions
Bulk Screening
Citation Graph
Collaborative Reviews
Deep Literature Reviews
In Product Support Chat
Multiple Citation Formats
Pubmed Integration
Ris/Csv Export
Zotero Integration
Academic Search
AI Summarization
Browser Extension
Citation Generation
Document Upload
Export FormatsExcel, reference export formats
Fact Checking
Follow Up Questions
Mobile App
Multi Source Synthesis
Team Collaboration
Web Search
Integrations
Browser Extension
Google Docs Export
Key IntegrationsChrome Extension, University Library systems, Organization licensingPubMed, OpenAlex, ERIC, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, Web of Science
Notion Integration
Zotero Integration