Head-to-head · facts checked 14 Sept 2026
Greptile vs Locofy.ai
Greptile uniquely has 7 features · Locofy.ai uniquely has 3 features.
From
Free (Starter)
Free plan
Yes
The verdict
Greptile or Locofy.ai?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Greptile
Free
Free
1 active developer, unlimited repos, 50 review credits a month
Starter
Free
1 active developer, unlimited repos, 50 credits/month (1 credit = 1 standard review)
Pro
$30/seat/mo
Unlimited repos, 50 credits/seat, $1 per additional credit, unlimited users, custom rules, unlimited external app connections Custom pricing available for annual contracts.
Enterprise
Custom pricing · Custom
Self-hosted option, SSO/SAML, GitHub Enterprise, dedicated Slack support, custom DPA and invoicing
Locofy.ai
Free
Free
7-day trial with all Hobby features, 2,000 LDMtokens, 1 frame at a time, 10 frames per project
Hobby
$40/mo · Not listed
2,000 LDMtokens, 1 frame at a time, 10 frames per project limit, individual use, content may be used to improve platform
Pro
$80/mo · Not listed
4,000 LDMtokens, 25 frames per project, secured SaaS, content never used for training, includes free UIPro Pro account
Enterprise
Custom · Annual billing available
Custom LDMtoken tiers, unlimited teams & collaboration, unlimited frames, GitHub integration, dedicated support, private cloud/self-hosted options
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Greptile
Pros
- Indexes the entire codebase into a graph structure covering files, functions, and dependencies, not just the diff being reviewed.
- Catches breaking changes in files three or more layers removed from the PR, which most diff-only tools miss.
- Inline comments come with click-to-apply suggestions, reducing friction for developers acting on feedback.
- PR summaries include natural language explanations and optional Mermaid diagrams of affected logic.
- Custom coding standards can be written in plain English, with no proprietary rule DSL to learn.
- The TREX agent writes and runs tests for each PR inside a sandboxed environment, adding automated test generation to the workflow.
- v4 release explicitly targeted false positive reduction, showing iterative improvement based on real user pain points.
- Security scanning for overflow vulnerabilities and undefined method calls is built into the review pass without requiring a separate tool.
Cons
- Earlier versions had a significant false positive noise problem, which required a dedicated v4 release to address.
- Greptile does not do code completion or code generation, limiting its usefulness to review workflows only.
- The TREX test generation feature is too new to have a reliable track record in production environments.
- Security scanning is not a dedicated SAST tool, so teams with serious security requirements may still need a separate solution.
- The breadth of features, review, refactoring suggestions, security, test generation, risks jack-of-all-trades quality trade-offs.
Locofy.ai
Pros
- Supports a wide range of frameworks including React, React Native, Next.js, Angular, Vue, Flutter, SwiftUI, and Jetpack Compose, broader than most competitors at its price point.
- Uses a proprietary Large Design Model (LDM) trained specifically on design data rather than general code, which may better understand spacing, component hierarchies, and layout intent.
- Integrates directly as a Figma plugin, making it easy to connect existing design workflows without major tool changes.
- Also supports Penpot, giving designers who don't use Figma a viable alternative entry point.
- Offers a VS Code extension and CLI for importing design systems, supporting developer-side workflow integration.
- Focused scope as a design-to-code converter means it does one job deliberately rather than being a bloated general-purpose tool.
- Component tagging workflow is straightforward, lowering the learning curve for initial use.
Cons
- No inline autocomplete, code review, test generation, or debugging tools, it is strictly a design-to-code converter and will disappoint those expecting a full AI coding assistant.
- The Adobe XD plugin is described as legacy, suggesting slower platform support and possible deprecation risk.
- It is unclear from available evidence whether the LDM's design-focused training actually delivers consistently better output quality in practice.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | Singapore |
| AI model | Proprietary (multi-LLM swarm agents) | Proprietary Large Design Models (LDM) |
| User base | 9,000+ teams | — |
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, GitLab, IDE integrations, MCP, API | Web, Figma Plugin, Penpot Plugin, Adobe XD Plugin, VS Code Extension |
| Languages | Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Elixir, Java, C, C++, C#, Swift, PHP, Rust, and most others | English only |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes, 7-day trial with all Hobby features and 2,000 LDMtokens |
| Free trial | Yes — 14-day free trial | Yes — 7 days (all Hobby features) |
| Starting price | Free (Starter) | $40/mo (Hobby plan) |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
| All plans | Free — Free Starter — Free Pro — $30/seat/mo Enterprise — Custom pricing | Free — Free Hobby — $40/mo Pro — $80/mo Enterprise — Custom |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | Engineering teams and individual developers who want AI-powered pull request code review with deep codebase context | Frontend developers and designers converting Figma/Penpot designs into production-ready UI code |
| Differentiator | Greptile builds a graph index of your entire codebase and uses a swarm of parallel agents to review PRs with full cross-file context, catching complex multi-file logical bugs that human reviewers and simpler diff-only tools miss. | Uses proprietary Large Design Models (LDM) trained on millions of designs to convert Figma/Penpot layouts into pixel-perfect, production-grade frontend code without relying solely on general-purpose LLMs, with MCP integration for AI coding agents like Cursor and Claude. |
| Competitors | CodeRabbit, BugBot, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Sourcegraph | Anima, Builder.io, Fronty, DhiWise, Penpot |
| Features | ||
| Cli Support | — | ✓ |
| Code Completion | ✕ | ✕ |
| Code Generation | ✕ | ✓ |
| Code Review | ✓ | ✕ |
| Codebase Indexing | ✓ | — |
| Debugging | ✓ | ✕ |
| Git Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| IDE Plugins | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Language Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Refactoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Security Scanning | ✓ | ✕ |
| Self Hosted Option | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test Generation | ✓ | ✕ |
| Integrations | ||
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Github Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gitlab Integration | ✓ | — |
| Jetbrains Plugin | — | ✕ |
| Key Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, Greptile MCP, Zapier, SSO/SAML (Enterprise) | Figma, Penpot, Adobe XD, VS Code, GitHub, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Claude, Gemini CLI, Material UI, Bootstrap, Ant Design, Chakra UI |
| Vscode Extension | — | ✓ |
Section 03
Greptile vs Locofy.ai: common questions
Is Greptile or Locofy.ai cheaper?
Greptile's cheapest paid plan is Free (Starter) and Locofy.ai's is $40/mo (Hobby plan). Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Greptile matchups
