Head-to-head
Galileo AI vs Stitch
Galileo AI uniquely has 8 features · Stitch uniquely has 4 features.
The verdict
Galileo AI or Stitch?
Section 01
Pricing, plan by plan
Every plan each vendor publishes, monthly and yearly where both are offered.
Galileo AI
Free
$0/mo · $0/yr
5,000 traces/month, unlimited users, unlimited custom evals
Pro
$150/mo · $1,200/yr
50,000 traces/month, standard RBAC, advanced analytics, dedicated Slack support; scales by traces
Enterprise
Custom
Unlimited traces, VPC/on-prem deploy, enterprise RBAC/SSO, real-time guardrails, 24/7 support, dedicated CSM
SStitch
Stitch does not publish a plan list we could read.
Section 02
Pros and cons
From each tool's full review, written from the same checked facts.
Galileo AI
Pros
- Luna models reduce LLM-as-judge evaluation costs by 96% compared to running full LLM evaluators, making large-scale evals financially viable.
- Seamlessly connects offline evaluation during development with real-time production monitoring in a single unified workflow.
- Automatically generates eval datasets from synthetic data and live production traces, eliminating the need to write test cases manually.
- Specifically designed for LLM observability, meaning the platform is purpose-built rather than a generic developer tool with evaluation bolted on.
- Detects critical LLM failure modes including hallucinations, prompt injections, and agent misbehavior at production scale.
- Founded in 2021 with a focused niche in evaluation engineering, suggesting domain depth rather than broad surface-level tooling.
- Treats offline testing and live production monitoring as a single connected loop, unlike most competitors who separate these phases.
Cons
- Galileo does not offer code generation, autocomplete, or refactoring features, making it unsuitable for general developer productivity use cases.
- The 96% cost reduction claim for Luna models is specific but unverified by third parties, requiring cautious interpretation.
- Narrow platform focus means teams need separate tooling for any use case outside LLM evaluation and observability.
- Marketing language on the homepage is described as confident but vague, suggesting a gap between pitch and practical transparency.
- As a relatively young company founded in 2021, long-term platform stability and enterprise support track record are harder to assess.
- Candid user accounts were harder to surface than vendor documentation, limiting independent validation of performance claims.
SStitch
Pros
- Generates a user-interface screen directly from a plain-text description.
- Turns an uploaded screenshot or a photo of a hand-drawn wireframe into a matching UI design.
- Generates front-end code for the same design it produces, ready to build from.
- A generated design can be exported straight to Figma for further work there.
- Runs on Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro model.
Cons
- Stitch does not generate standalone images, only UI screens.
- There is no image-editing feature such as background removal or object replacement.
- Stitch cannot import an existing Figma file; it only exports its own output to Figma.
- It runs only as a web app, with no desktop or mobile version.
- Google publishes no pricing page for Stitch outside the signed-in app, so no plan or cost is listed anywhere reachable.
- Google publishes no terms of service or privacy policy for Stitch outside the app either.
Side by side
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2024 |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | Mountain View, USA |
| AI model | Proprietary (Luna models + LLM-as-judge) | Gemini (Google) |
| Platforms | Web, SaaS, VPC, On-Premises | Web |
| Languages | English only (platform UI) | English primarily |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes — Free tier with 5,000 traces/month, unlimited users, unlimited custom evals | Yes |
| Free trial | No — Free tier available indefinitely | No (entirely free) |
| Starting price | $0/mo — Free | Free |
| Enterprise | Custom | — |
| Refund policy | — | Not applicable |
| All plans | Free — $0/mo Pro — $150/mo Enterprise — Custom | — |
| Positioning | ||
| Best for | AI/ML engineers and developer teams building, evaluating, and monitoring LLM-powered applications and agents | Non-designers who need app screens generated straight from a sketch, screenshot or existing webpage |
| Differentiator | Galileo uniquely distills expensive LLM-as-judge evaluators into compact Luna models that run as low-latency, low-cost production guardrails — turning offline evals directly into real-time safety controls at 96% lower cost. | Google-backed AI UI generator that converts text prompts directly into production-ready app screens and exports natively to Figma with multi-user collaboration launched at Google I/O 2026 |
| Competitors | Langsmith, Arize AI, Weights & Biases, Helicone, Braintrust, Humanloop | Galileo AI, Uizard, Locofy, Visily, Framer AI |
| Features | ||
| AI Image Builtin | — | ✓ |
| Background Removal | — | ✕ |
| Brand Kit | — | ✕ |
| Code Completion | ✕ | — |
| Code Generation | ✕ | — |
| Code Review | ✕ | — |
| Codebase Indexing | ✕ | — |
| Debugging | ✓ | — |
| Git Integration | ✓ | — |
| IDE Plugins | ✓ | — |
| Logo Generation | — | ✕ |
| Presentation Design | — | ✕ |
| Print Ready | — | ✕ |
| Refactoring | ✕ | — |
| Security Scanning | ✓ | — |
| Self Hosted Option | ✓ | — |
| Social Templates | — | ✕ |
| Team Collaboration | — | ✓ |
| Team Features | ✓ | — |
| Test Generation | ✓ | — |
| UI Wireframe | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Adobe Export | — | ✕ |
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Figma Export | — | ✓ |
| Google Slides | — | ✕ |
| Jetbrains Plugin | ✕ | — |
| Key Integrations | NVIDIA NeMo, NVIDIA NIM, NeMo Guardrails, CrewAI, MongoDB, HP AI Studio, Cisco Outshift, MCP server | Figma |
| Shopify | — | ✕ |
Section 03
Galileo AI vs Stitch: common questions
Is Galileo AI or Stitch cheaper?
Galileo AI's cheapest paid plan is $0/mo — Free and Stitch's is Free. Compare what each plan includes below before going on price alone.
Keep comparing
More Galileo AI matchups
